tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6557458849091969678.post2046457170547193165..comments2023-06-15T09:13:45.467-04:00Comments on Liberty's Torch: The Smoking FBIFrancis W. Porrettohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05862584203772592282noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6557458849091969678.post-12084851430321756282016-01-10T05:30:07.800-05:002016-01-10T05:30:07.800-05:00That she can even be allowed to run as a candidate...That she can even be allowed to run as a candidate is proof enough that she is untouchable. It is a known fact that she used to office of the Secretary of State to enrich herself, seeing that State decided in favor of those who "donated" money for those favorable decisions.<br /><br />She and Willie have gotten away with so much, including - probably - murder for hire. The "Clinton Death List" can't be ignored. Too many connected with suspected(and real) illegal activities by the Clintons have died, several having obviously been murdered. It is unreasonable to think that long list could simply be coincidence.<br /><br />A country - and a government - which would allow Obama to run for that office and be elected - twice - and ignore his treasonous behavior (assisting a country which continues to swear it will destroy us with its development of nuclear weapons) is a country that will simply ignore her many immoral and illegal behaviors, just as she has ignored questions concerning them. Brace yourself for the very strong possibility of another Clinton administration, this one much worse than the first.Reg Thttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14099612693763932005noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6557458849091969678.post-75091745928239504492016-01-09T11:41:43.444-05:002016-01-09T11:41:43.444-05:00Her lawyers are already spinning up their engines ...Her lawyers are already spinning up their engines on the e-mail that <i>implies</i> she instructed Sullivan to remove classification headers – and I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that they might win this.<br /><br />The argument is that the e-mail doesn't <i>prove</i> what was sent was classified. The headers removed may not have been classification headers, they may have been something as simple as a distribution list of people who weren't supposed to know each other, and the contents might have been a pizza recipe or the like.<br /><br />As far as why they would have wanted to send something on the secure FAX, well, maybe it was an <i>extra special</i> pizza recipe.<br /><br />Without the document that was sent as evidence, I'm not sure they couldn't win this in court with that argument. Malatropenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6557458849091969678.post-15212387909936010392016-01-09T07:26:29.347-05:002016-01-09T07:26:29.347-05:00Absolutely not, Fran.
The people that are up in H...Absolutely not, Fran.<br /><br />The people that are up in Hillary's and Obama's strata (CFR, etc.) will never let a blip like this get out of hand.<br /><br />The media will try to to spin it as, "nothing important was compromised."<br /><br />If that doesn't work, the story will become that Hillary Clinton was singled out for doing what everyone in government does. That is, they ALL do something that might seem nefarious if we focused on them as the FBI has done to Hillary.<br /><br />And if THAT doesn't work, Obama will do what he does: make strawman arguments, invoke unconstitutional executive orders, lie in speech after speech or kick her under the bus while pardoning her and saying that her *one* shortcoming shouldn't blind us to her years of service and it's only partisan jerks that would condemn her for whatever she did. . . whatever that is . . . and it's not a if others hadn't done everything they could in service to THEIR ideals, so who are we to judge?<br /><br />This will go nowhere.<br /><br />Tim Turnernoreply@blogger.com