ISIS’s titular leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi has done us that service:
The leader of the Islamic State group Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on Thursday urged Muslims to emigrate to his self-proclaimed “caliphate,” in the jihadist supremo’s first audio recording in six months.“And we call upon every Muslim in every place to perform hijrah (emigration) to the Islamic State or fight in his land wherever that may be,” he said....
Echoing his previous exhortations, Baghdadi said moving to the caliphate he declared over parts of Iraq and Syria in June 2014 or waging jihad (holy war) at home was an obligation for Muslims.
“Has the time not come for you to know that there is no might nor honour nor safety nor rights for you except in the shade of the Caliphate?” he said in the speech, transcripts of which were released in five languages.
“O Muslims, Islam was never for a day the religion of peace. Islam is the religion of war,” he said, calling for mass mobilisation on the battlefield.
Which lickspittle political posturer or media pretender will be the first to proclaim, ex cathedra from his bellybutton, that al-Baghdadi is not preaching “true Islam?”
Actually, that service has already been rendered us by Barack Hussein Obama, when he orated that the Islamic State “is not Islamic, and it is not a state.” Perhaps he received an advance transcript of al-Baghdadi’s speech and decide to “get out in front of it.” As Obama is the world’s supreme authority on everything – just ask him – I suppose we can all relax about it.
Myself, I’m waiting for ISIS allegiants to commit a terrorist act here in the United States. That’s when the really thunderous denunciations will begin...but given the character of our political class and its media annex, they won’t be denunciations of Islam.
Never go to a religious war without your religion – Tom Kratman
George W. Bush, 43rd president of these United States, was a good man. He was an indifferent president, good on a few subjects and somewhat aimless about others, but the Oval Office has been occupied by few individuals of better character. Unfortunately, he was hobbled by a failing that afflicts many men of good will: he ardently wanted to see the other guy’s character as a match to his own.
President Bush’s famous September 20, 2001 speech to the nation, in which he first proclaimed Islam to be “a religion of peace,” was probably the worst misstep of his presidential tenure. The historical record speaks clearly in the opposite direction. Ever since Thomas Jefferson’s presidency, the actions of Muslims and Islam-dominated states have unambiguously shouted Islam-Uber-Alles. Indeed, Islam is the only recognized religion whose highest figures made common cause with the Nazis in the 1930s and 1940s.
(I’ve long suspected that the wholly unsubstantiated and unjustified odium poured upon Pope Pius XII was an attempt to deflect attention from the alliance between Hitler and Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, at that time the highest authority in Islam. A great many persons revile the Catholic Church, mainly because it preaches against things they’d like to feel free to do. More, they’ve noticed that Christians don’t go on a rampage when slandered.)
But there is no truth so starkly obvious that it cannot be denied by one resolutely determined to deny it. There is no fact so plain that it cannot be obscured with a mountain of distractions and irrelevancies. Perhaps most important of all, there are few who will speak openly and plainly against a moving force that:
- Is religiously motivated;
- Has infiltrated one’s own country;
- Has demonstrated lethal intentions and capability;
- Is ready, willing, and able to kill those who dare to speak against it.
The recent attack on Pamela Geller’s Draw Muhammad contest in Garland, Texas should have provided a wake-up call. Yet note how many persons, on either side of the political spectrum, leaped to condemn Geller for her “provocation.” Note how many commentators spoke and acted as if utterly indifferent to the rather simple proposition that cartoons cannot and do not provide a justification for murder. Andres Serrano’s “Piss Christ?” Chris Ofili’s dung-festooned caricature of the Blessed Virgin Mary? These things provoked complaints, even protests, from Christians, but no violence whatsoever. But don’t you dare satirize the intolerance of Islam and Muslims; why, that could get someone killed!
Such...persons are unlikely to acknowledge al-Baghdadi’s plain words, either.
“What you are speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say.” – Ralph Waldo Emerson
Among a Left that has enshrined tolerance as the supreme virtue, the irony of their passive acceptance of violently intolerant Islam stands as one of the marvels of our time. It could be cowardice, of course; many persons animated by fear will do anything not to admit to it. It could also be tactical, for what does the Left hate more than Christianity and Christian ethics? In either case, there is no better demonstration of the fatuity of Leftism than its celebration of homosexuality and abortion united to its angry defense of Islam on the grounds of “religious tolerance.”
The political class, the media, and the educational establishment – the three major bastions of the Left in American society – are setting us up for a terrible calamity. They’re complicit in the continuing importation of adherents to this seventh-century murder cult. If it’s out of ignorance, it’s inexcusable. If it’s willful blindness – an insistence upon seeing in Islam a benevolence that is not there and never has been – its ridiculous. If it’s tactical, it’s vile and wholly to be condemned.
The best service a President Cruz or President Perry could do for this nation is to reject President Bush’s “religion of peace” error and publicly recognize the facts as they are. Indeed, one of the criteria for selecting a Republican nominee should be the requirement that he announce his hostility to Islam and the immigration of Muslims to these shores, openly and without compromise despite any and all opposition. Americans – people who love this country – would love him for it.
Let’s close with an old favorite:
While I have been familiar with YAAFM 12 for many years (I need to see if I have the original Flash animation files on my old WinXP box; they're much clearer than this YouTube port of the video), some folks here may not be. As such, an advisory that the video contains some rather salty language might be in order, so that your readers can view it in an appropriate venue.
ReplyDeleteAnother thought, beyond the probable cowardice of Western leaders who suck up to islam, is that anti-Semitism has been increasing throughout the world. One has only to look at Pope Francis, who ignores the killing of Christians and the burning of churches throughout the Middle East and Africa while he sucks up to the so-called "Palestinians", even to the extent of considering canonizing muslim "nuns".
ReplyDeleteJudaism - home of the "Christ-Killers" - has never been looked upon with fondness by the Holy See, even if we cannot prove Pius XII's involvement in the Final Solution (at the very least looking the other way, although many parish priests did what they could to hide or otherwise assist Jews).
The attention paid to muslims, along with fawning attempts to play up to them by Obama, Pope Francis, and so many other "leaders" leaves me believing that hatred of Jews, especially Israelis since they stand up for themselves (as opposed to liberal American Jews who voted for and support scum like Obama, Schumer, et al) are subject to a resurgence of the anti-Semitism that has been waxing and waning since Moses guided them to "The Promised Land". Long before the camel herders got there.
Right now I find myself glad to have left The Roman Catholic church so many years ago. I have no quarrel with the religion, even though I am now an agnostic, but the Church - especially the Vatican hierarchy - leaves me cold. I fully understand how Ann Barnhardt feels about the Church, while she continues to strive to be the best Catholic/Christian she is able to be.