Our Constitution, in the very First
Amendment, guarantees “freedom of religion” and “freedom of speech.” Every member of the US Military takes an
oath to “support
and defend” that right and all other rights enshrined in that sacred
document, “against
all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Our Christian founders knew these rights had to
be enumerated to keep the federal government, and others, from dictating the
manner in which people could worship, and to prevent the establishment of a
national church like the Church of England.
When someone
exercises their First Amendment free speech rights in a way that offends
Christians, Biblical response is to, as Jesus half-brother James said, “Consider
it pure joy, my brothers and sisters, whenever you face trials of
many kinds, because you know that the testing of your faith produces
perseverance.” Jesus put it this way, “Blessed
are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the
kingdom of heaven. Blessed are you when
people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you
because of me. Rejoice and be glad, because
great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets
who were before you.”
How
have some Muslims responded to something that offends them concerning their
“Prophet”? We’ve seen it in Denmark, Paris,
and most recently Garland, Texas. Those
groups were only exercising what the US should consider, constitutionally
protected, First Amendment free speech.
Wenzel Strategies conducted a poll of six-hundred American Muslims
(with a margin of error of less than four percent.) When asked, “Do you believe
criticism of Islam or Mohammed should be permitted under the Constitution’s
First Amendment?” 57.8% said, “No.”
A clear majority do not believe the Constitution protects free speech
with regard to Islam. Perhaps because,
in the same poll, over 32%, nearly one-third, said Shariah law should
be the supreme law of the land in the US.
Is it confusion about the Constitution, or an underlying belief
that Sharia trumps the Constitution?
It’s one thing to have a philosophical or
theological disagreement, it’s quite another to believe you should be killed
over it. When those same American
Muslims were asked, “Do you agree or
disagree that Americans who criticize or parody Islam should be put to death?”
11.5% of the American Muslims surveyed either agree (4.3%), or strongly agree (7.2%),
that Americans who criticize or parody Islam should be put to death.
Given that
a majority of American Muslims don’t think criticism of Islam or their prophet
is protected, and more than eleven percent thinks that offensively exercising
one’s Constitutional right deserves death, just how big is the impending train
wreck going to be? Let’s use the study
titled, “The
American Mosque 2011″ by Ihsan Bagby of the University of Kentucky.
Bagby reports there are 2,106 mosques in the US, more than
double the 962 in 1994. This doesn’t
include groups not considered Islamic, e.g. Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam. According to Bagby’s work, the states with
the highest number of mosques are: New York (257), California (246), Texas
(166), Florida (118), Illinois (109), New Jersey (109), Pennsylvania (99),
Michigan (77), Georgia (69), and Virginia (62).
Based on his work Bagby projected 2.6 million “mosque participants,” up
from 2 million in 2000. Bagby extrapolates
that if non-affiliated adherents were included the total “should be closer to
the estimates of up to 7 million.”
The coming Islamic train crash is not with Christians, it’s with the Constitution.
As I've been saying ofr quite some time now, there is no "radical islam", no "moderate islam", there is only "islam" - as clearly demonstrated and personified by ISIS.
ReplyDeleteHere is the truth from the camel's mouth:
Avrech: Moderate Muslims Speak Up - And It's Not Pretty http://www.virtualjerusalem.com/blogs.php?Itemid=16829
For your information UK railway collision photograph was taken from Maze Hill signal box (SE London) on 4th July 1958.
ReplyDelete4 EPB electric unit no. 5023 was in collision with 'C' class steam locomotive 31461. Motor coach no. 14045 was scrapped as was 31461. The remaining three coaches we used in unit reformations.