Saturday, April 25, 2026

Forward, Into The Past! 2026-04-25

     (Thank you, Firesign Theater, for anticipating this need.)

     Quoth Matt Walsh:

     Yes, those are valid statistics. They may mix misdemeanors with felonies, but I’m unable to resolve that at this time.

     Time was, there were “three strikes” provisions on the law books in several states. Those laws constrained the sentencing practices of judges: a criminal convicted of a third felony offense was automatically sentenced to life without parole. For a while, those states locked up felony recidivists permanently; the public was permanently protected from their proclivities.

     I’m not sure what happened to those three-strikes laws. This article sheds some light, but not enough to be sure that the three-strikes provision is still enforced. Among the facets of criminal law that would bear on this is the propensity of judges and prosecutors to alter an indictment on their own authority. A judge who dislikes the three-strikes provision might unilaterally dismiss a felony indictment to keep an accused criminal from suffering permanent incarceration.

     There is also the racial aspect to consider. If we go by national demographics, American prison populations already overrepresent blacks and Hispanics. The implications are not hard to grasp. Neither is the message a further concentration of imprisoned blacks and Hispanics would send to the White majority.

     The hawkers of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” are violently hostile to an accurate representation of blacks and Hispanics among felonious criminals. It’s the statistic they dislike most. So they screech about “social justice” and “the legacy of slavery,” as if those were valid justifications for allowing habitual felons to continue to prey on the rest of us.

     However, another statistic is on my mind this morning: the population of these United States. That’s estimated at 330 million persons. If we were to imprison 5% of that number, that’s 16.5 million permanently incarcerated persons. I don’t know if enough prisons could be built and staffed to accommodate that many permanent residents. A far smaller number of persons are imprisoned today – about 1.25 million – and cries of “prison overcrowding” already resound nationally.

     An old friend, a far harsher person than I, advocated not lifelong incarceration for the habitual felon but execution: “Three strikes and you’re dead.” Given the way the death penalty is treated today, that wouldn’t relieve the pressure on our prisons. But Tom is a forthright fellow; he envisioned the application of the penalty to occur immediately after the third conviction.

     That calls to mind a scene from Neal Stephenson’s early novel The Diamond Age:

     “Congratulations, Bud, you're a pa,” Judge Fang said. “I gather from your reaction that this comes as something of a surprise. It seems evident that your relationship with this Tequila is tenuous, and so I do not find that there are any mitigating circumstances I should take into account in sentencing. That being the case, I would like you to go out that door over there”—Judge Fang pointed to a door in the corner of the courtroom—“and all the way down the steps. Leave through the exit door and cross the street, and you will find a pier sticking out into the river. Walk to the end of that pier until you are standing on the red part and await further instructions.”
     […]
     The pier did not turn red until the very end, where it began to slope down steeply toward the river. It had been coated with some kind of grippy stuff so his feet wouldn't fly out from under him. He turned around and looked back up at the domed court building, searching for a window where he might make out the face of Judge Fang or one of his gofers. The family of Chinese was following him down the pier, carrying their long bundle, which was draped with garlands of flowers and, as Bud now realized, was probably the corpse of a family member. He had heard about these piers; they were called funeral piers.
     Several dozen of the microscopic explosives known as cookie-cutters detonated in his bloodstream.

     Efficient, yes, but I’m fairly sure our anti-death-penalty activists would disapprove, to say nothing of the social-justice crowd.

     Still, that 5% statistic has considerable power. If it were to get the right amount of airtime and column-inches, who could say what might follow? The conversion of Manhattan Island into a giant, open-air prison camp, perhaps?

     Just an early-morning thought.

2 comments:

  1. Coincidentally, this turned up today.
    https://x.com/MichaelARothman/status/2047702700419396067?s=20
    “𝘌𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘗𝘢𝘭𝘰 𝘈𝘭𝘵𝘰 — 𝘢 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘭𝘰𝘸 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 — 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘶𝘣𝘵𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘣𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮∗𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘜𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘱𝘰𝘱𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯.”

    — “𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘹𝘵 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳, 𝘮∗𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘥 30%, 40%, 50% 𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳.”

    — “𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴𝘯’𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘰𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘭𝘢𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘥 𝘢 𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝐩𝐮𝐭 𝐚 𝐥𝐨𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐚𝐝 𝐠𝐮𝐲𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐛𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘢𝘳𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘯’𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴.”

    — “𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘩𝘪𝘨𝘩 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘢, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘫𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘴. 𝘐𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘶𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐢𝐫𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘴.”
    Transcript of𝘝𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘰 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 @𝘋𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘺𝘚𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭

    Govrnmentt growing parties NEVER figure it out. High crime rates provide an excuse to grow government many times larger. In addition to the power increase there's far more money to launder and find its way to where the parties wishes not to disclose.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have heard it said that police don't exist to protect the public from criminals, but to protect criminals from the public.

    Vigilance committees of old weren't necessarily a bad thing. Fathers and uncles know instinctively what sort of punishment should await a rapist.

    If a crime has three or more witnesses (like the murder of Iryna Zarutska,) a trial shouldn't take more than half a day: The sentence should be carried out that afternoon, and the resulting corpse disposed of without ceremony.

    We are doing "justice" wrong.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated. I am entirely arbitrary about what I allow to appear here. Toss me a bomb and I might just toss it back with interest. You have been warned.