tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6557458849091969678.post2067661519890011904..comments2023-06-15T09:13:45.467-04:00Comments on Liberty's Torch: The Best Dots Connect ThemselvesFrancis W. Porrettohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05862584203772592282noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6557458849091969678.post-32707150836596459912019-04-01T00:02:26.227-04:002019-04-01T00:02:26.227-04:00Sundance is the best and most comprehensive sleuth...Sundance is the best and most comprehensive sleuth behind these dastardly undertakings. Genesis rests with Brennen. Would not be surprised if Brennen initiated a pow wow with Obama and Jarret to cook up a plan (or vice versa).Andy Texanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08930212556020086701noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6557458849091969678.post-29978252082163875312019-03-31T22:09:14.557-04:002019-03-31T22:09:14.557-04:00Words have fixed meanings, or should. Sarah Noble...Words have fixed meanings, or should. Sarah Noble misused "exonerate." The abuse of terminology is now a hallmark of the left's disinformation. <br />In Western Law and Epistemology, all knowledge, and all assertions of knowledge, must be supported by evidence, i.e., the evidence of the senses or knowledge reducible to sense data. What constitutes evidence of crime is a vital part of forensic science.<br />. Mueller and his team found no evidence to support the charges of collusion or obstruction of justice. Mueller and friends know exactly what constitutes probative evidence. Half a dozen people were legally tortured or extorted for probative evidence, but nothing was forthcoming. Not a scintilla of probative evidence to support an indictment was uncovered.<br />. Why is the left saying that the Mueller report "does not exonerate" Trump? This statement is technically true, but very misleading. Check Wikipedia. “Exoneration occurs when the conviction for a crime is reversed, either through demonstration of innocence, a flaw in the conviction, or otherwise. .... The transitive verb, "to exonerate" can also mean to informally absolve one from blame.”<br />. There was no crime. There was no indictment, no conviction and no blame. Technically, there can be no exoneration because there is nothing of which to be exonerated. That's why the Mueller Probe doesn't exonerate anyone. That's a technical point. Trump is innocent, entirely innocent, until proven guilty of an actual crime with evidence.<br />. <br /> Feel free to re-work this thought, and Thanks for your consistently intelligent articles. Christian David Sweeny.<br /><br /><br />Selfish Davehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04667324411421722305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6557458849091969678.post-47191144944947366742019-03-31T07:17:15.795-04:002019-03-31T07:17:15.795-04:00The answer, as you suggest, is obvious. But IMHO ...The answer, as you suggest, is obvious. But IMHO there's more.<br /><br />When Trump won, I remember a comment from some leftie to the effect that not only must Trump be destroyed, but that another such as him must never arise again.<br /><br />And that's why the pressure will never, EVER relent. There could be angels on high descending a glowing staircase with a divine declaration engraved in diamond of Trump's innocence in all this, and it would not be enough. The precedent must be set: any "populist" who resists the one world Socialist Utopia they plan on making must be razed to the ground as an example to the others.<br /><br />This is why the European populists are excoriated so. Why Trump is attacked ruthlessly. The message must be sent to any others who might try to go for the Presidential ring: this will happen to you - you, your family, your friends, your associates... anyone connected with you in any way will come under fire. Thus, any populist with ambitions will be pulled down not only through fear for themselves, but by the fear of those around them.<br />NITZAKHONhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04110716447757507226noreply@blogger.com