The vote heard 'round the world

First "Brexit," then Trump. If both our nations pushed back against the Globalists in the same year, that'd be some Hope & Change I could actually believe in!

The death-cult of Feminism can only be destroyed from within...

From the Overview of my 5000 word essay:

A future apocalypse is a perennial favorite in fiction. At the direction of authors and screenwriters, it has befallen our planet in countless ways. We’ve been overrun by zombies, aliens, machines; been done-in by enviro-disasters, medical-hazards, plummeting asteroids; been besieged by falling sharks, crawling fish, monstrous mutant insects; and finally, perhaps scariest of all, we’ve merely suffered to death under the boots or pumps of bleak totalitarians.

Welcome to 2016, wherein the feminized West is well into the process of eating its own tail. You see, in the real world, if one simply has patience, humans can be taken step by teeny tiny step until an entire civilized people are willing to commit cultural-suicide. Can those of us with eyes still wide open get our countrymen to stop before they get to a vital organ? Stay tuned.

 Find the complete essay here.

A Man Who Understands Both Islam And Preparedness

     You may have heard of him and the institution he administers. It’s Jerry Falwell Jr., President of Liberty University:

     At a time when most college campuses prohibit guns, Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr. thinks the opposite should be the case — urging his school’s students to be armed, especially in light of this week’s massacre in San Bernardino, California.

     “I always thought that if more good people had concealed-carry permits, then we could end those Muslims before they walk in and kill,” he said.

     Those comments from Falwell — a son of the late evangelist, conservative political activist and Liberty University founder — spurred vigorous applause from thousands of students gathered Friday night for Liberty’s weekly convocation. In a phone interview Saturday with CNN, Falwell said he wasn’t talking about all Muslims, just those who perpetrate attacks.

     The disclaimer at the end should be taken with a grain of salt, for jihad is a religious obligation of all Muslims. A Muslim with the means and opportunity to strike a blow at “the infidel” is commanded to take it, whether it involves actual violence, political agitation, the fomenting of unrest, the support or concealment of active jihadists, or merely the funding of Islamic mouthpiece groups. Explicit calls to violence are shot throughout the creed:

     Qur'an, Sura 8:12: "I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their fingertips off them."

     Qur'an, Sura 9:5: "But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem..."

     Qur'an, Sura 9:29: "Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, of the people of the Book, until they pay the jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued."

     Qur'an, Sura 9:73: "O Prophet! Struggle against the unbelievers and hypocrites and be harsh with them."

     "Islam says: Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to Paradise, which can be opened only for Holy Warriors! These are hundreds of other psalms and Hadiths urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all that mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim." – Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini

     "The minarets are our bayonets; the domes are our helmets. Mosques are our barracks, the believers are soldiers. This holy army guards my religion. Almighty Our journey is our destiny, the end is martyrdom." – Recep Tayyip Erdogan

     I propose that we take Islam at its word.

---

     He who studies the history of mass violence without prejudice or preconceptions soon concludes that today’s greatest threats are:

• Governments,
• Terrorism.

     For the moment, there’s little we can do about governments. Terrorism, as I wrote just a little earlier, constitutes a diffuse, decentralized threat, to which only a diffuse, decentralized defense – an armed citizenry – can respond effectively...and terrorism is almost exclusively an Islamic phenomenon.

     As I stated above, Islam advocates the subjugation of the entire world, by force. It aims for the complete elimination of every religion except Islam. Muslims, especially Muslims who live in non-Muslim-majority nations, are commanded to participate in that program to whatever extent is possible. That is what the creed dictates; there’s no denying it, though Muslims pressed to do so will talk around the matter rather than give a candid answer.

     Armed societies – granted, there aren’t many to study just now – suffer far fewer mass shootings than disarmed societies. Indeed, they suffer far less crime of all sorts, for the general public is equipped to respond with force. To be armed is to be prepared for violence; to be unarmed is to be prepared for victimization.

     Israel, the country most threatened by Islam-powered terrorism, doesn’t suffer mass shootings. Its people are armed and ready. The “Palestinian” who wants to kill a large number Israelis will prefer explosives. Muslim murderers virtually anywhere else can gun down dozens before “the authorities” can respond. San Bernardino is only the most recent example.

     Jerry Falwell Jr. understands these things. More, he’s willing to say so. Compare his clarity and forthrightness to the following statements from two of his detractors:

     “My administration is committed to making Virginia an open and welcoming Commonwealth, while also ensuring the safety of all of our citizens. Mr. Falwell’s rash and repugnant comments detract from both of those crucial goals.” – Terry McAuliffe, governor of Virginia and rabid anti-gun activist

     “This is the kind of deplorable not only hateful response to a legitimate security issue. But it is giving aid and comfort to ISIS and other radical jihadists.” – Hillary Clinton, Democrat presidential candidate and multiply cuckolded wife of William Jefferson “Bill” Clinton

     Which of the persons I’ve quoted today makes the most sense to you?

Quickies: The Heart Of The Matter

     There’s been some comment from the FBI to the effect that the San Bernardino massacre “might” have been terrorism. It might surprise some Gentle Readers, but I don’t think so.

     I think this was jihad, pure and simple: the killing of the greatest possible number of “infidels.” Enhancing the sense of insecurity we feel was a secondary priority at most.

     The “very religious” Muslim couple who perpetrated these killings might have been ISIS or al-Qaeda affiliates, but at this time such a connection has not been made. But they were devout Muslims, and the Qur’an explicitly instructs Muslims to do what they did when the opportunity presents itself:

     Qur'an, Sura 8:12: "I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their fingertips off them."

     Qur'an, Sura 9:5: "But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem..."

     Qur'an, Sura 9:29: "Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, of the people of the Book, until they pay the jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued."

     Jihad is the religious obligation of any Muslim with the opportunity to strike a blow at Dar al-Harb. Syed Farook and his “wife” deemed themselves to have such an opportunity. They acted on it – and we should draw the appropriate lessons before any of their co-religionists do more of the same.

The best part of waking up used to be a cup of coffee...

I'm betting a lot of readers here have been as "obsessed" with the invasion of the EU as I have. Well, same goes for Matt Bracken. Only difference? He's done the hard work of connecting the historical and contemporary dots and churned out a magnum opus of an editorial. (Without cutting & pasting & WordCounting I'm betting it reaches 10,000 words.) A few choice paragraphs follow, but of course it's a must-read. Find it here, at Western Rifle Shooters.

The current open-border policies of the European international socialists were intentionally designed to allow hundreds of thousands of culturally and religiously aggressive Islamist fighters and colonists to flood into Europe. The European traitor elites understand exactly what they are doing. They know what will happen. But why do it now?

 Um-m-m, can you say, "Follow the money?"

The accelerated pace of the 2015 Muslim hijra invasion was conceived, planned and executed by Quisling traitors comprising the elite leadership of the European branch of the international socialist movement, headquartered in Brussels. To paraphrase British nationalist patriot Paul Weston, if a farmer deliberately inserts a fox into the henhouse, who is guilty of killing the hens?

Now, today, across Europe the stage is being set for the genocide of the weak, confused and defenseless European hens. Former East German Communist functionary Angela Merkel achieves high marks at both Muslim fox insertion and German hen repression.

We think "Sanctuary Cities" and churches protecting Mexicans is scary? How about all the mosques in the U.S.A. which have already proven to incite/incubate jihadists like the Boston-Marathon bombers and the Garland, Texas (Draw Mohammed) shooters? Oh, and the new ones breaking ground as we speak...

How many mosques have already received a truckload of shotguns or Kalashnikovs? Run the numbers again: eight jihadists per terror attack, eight hundred weapons per truck, 80,000 Viet Cong fighters in the original Tet Offensive, and an estimated 800,000 muhajirs flooding into Europe. Using radical mosques as clandestine armories is S.O.P in the Middle East, so why would the jihadists not use the same tactics in safe and docile Europe? Out of a sense of fairness and respect for European laws? Please. In the words of Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan, “The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers…” And bear in mind that anyplace an AK-47 can be smuggled, so too can a few kilos of Semtex.

I could go on but I'll let you read it in its entirety. In conclusion I'll swap Bracken's final lines with one of Aaron Zelman's:

"Never give up your Life Preserver."