Monday, April 8, 2019

“Why, Fran, Why?”

     I’m sure my Gentle Readers have noticed that I’ve left the political commentary to my esteemed Co-Conspirators these past few days to do other, lighter-toned things. I do that now and then. A steady diet of politics is bad for the soul (Just look at what it does to politicians.) Life in these United States is pretty damned good despite the corrupt state of our political system and the elite that largely remains at its helm. We may be living off our progenitors’ momentum, as Milton Friedman once said, but the ride continues to be a pleasant one.

     So I’ve been writing about things that tickle rather than enrage me. I hope they’ve tickled you as well, but…well…tastes do vary, and I know that there are people who need their spleens and bile glands refilled daily. Happily (?) there are many sites that will serve that need; Liberty’s Torch can afford to depart from it now and then.


     It’s now twenty-two years since I completed my first full-length novel. So many things have happened since then that, in the usual course of events, one might expect a novel written in roughly contemporary society to become dated. Out of curiosity I revered the book with an eye to that possibility, and found only one item that appears time-worn: a description of a personal computer.

     Have things really changed that little? Of course not. But when composing a story, the writer must concentrate on what matters to his characters as he’s defined them. Most of the changes that have come upon us these past two decades have made astonishingly little difference to the ways in which we live, conduct our affairs, and relate to one another.

     I take this as a confirmation of the late John Brunner’s Two Great Commandments of Fiction:

  1. The raw material of fiction is people.
  2. The essence of story is change.

     Brunner cleaved religiously to those dicta in his own books, which is what makes them so readable – for me, at least – despite his openly averred socialist convictions. His Hugo Award winner Stand on Zanzibar remains one of the greatest landmarks of the science-fiction genre. That’s not because of the few, relatively mild SF-like motifs it incorporates, but because it concentrates on developments in the lives of three unusual people: Donald Hogan, a scholar trained as an assassin; Norman Niblock House, a corporate executive immersed in an intriguing development project in Benin, Africa; and social theorist Chad Mulligan, a curious combination of misanthropic genius and ardent lover of Mankind.

     Brunner’s magnum opus makes the Hugo Award winners of recent years look like masturbatory finger exercises. Their authors should be ashamed to stand in his shadow, much less to let their shadows fall upon him.


     Long Island, New York is a special place in many senses. Among other things we have the least predictable seasonal weather patterns along the Atlantic Seaboard. It pays for a Long Island homeowner to be braced for anything and everything…and not to be too put out when it doesn’t arrive.

     About every third winter, for example, we get buried in snow. The entire Island grinds to a halt for two or three days while residents dig themselves and their chariots out of the snow and the Powers That Be try to remember who bribed them most recently and must have their streets cleared post haste. One chance in three of an apocalyptic snowfall is enough for us – the private citizens, not the political grifters – to prepare ourselves, and so most of us do, typically with snowblowers and large quantities of rock salt.

     So when December rolls around I roll Snidely, my 400-pound Toro dual-action snowblower, out of the shed where he summers and into the garage, from which I can extract him most readily should the need arise. Snidely usually returns to his summer cottage on or around April 10, as the latest in the year we’ve received a significant snowfall since I took up residence here fifty-two years ago was April 9. But as I deploy him, I also utter a silent, heartfelt prayer that Nature won’t put him – and me – to the test. The winter just behind us, that prayer was answered favorably, for which God be thanked.

     But there’s always a downside. When Snidely comes out for the winter, I must fill a gas can for him. He eats voraciously when in use. Thus, I must now dispose of a can of gasoline that’s five months old and nominally unsuitable for internal combustion. But backyard bonfires are considered passe, damn it all…to say nothing of the frowns of the fire-prevention authorities.


     It’s nearing the hour when another feature of Fortress life, my C6 Corvette Joy – remember Joy?

     …will make her seasonal debut. I think this will be my last year driving Joy. Among other things, my back has been complaining of recent abuses. Anyway, it costs the Moon to insure her. So I intend to enjoy her as much as possible this spring, summer, and fall.

     But there’s a downside here, too: As she’s a convertible, Joy must sleep under a roof. Therefore Milla, my Mercedes S550, must do so outdoors for the next few months. That makes it problematic to keep Milla’s batteries charged. Who in his right mind would run an electrical cord to a car battery trickle charger outdoors for such an interval? Not this Long Islander; the high school kids around here have too extensive a record for doing unfortunate things.

     Suggestions would be appreciated.


     It’s time to address the demands of the day. I hope the above hasn’t disappointed my Gentle Readers unduly. We all have lives, and despite my enviable status as a retiree, mine has its odd developments and requirements just like anyone else’s. Now and then those things are uppermost in my thoughts. Anyway, they make a refreshing change from the political blather.

     I’ll return tomorrow. Enjoy your Monday, if that’s not too unthinkable.

Exciting stuff.

Rulon Gardner's victory over Alexander Karelin of Russia in the Graeco-Roman heavyweight wrestling event in the 2000 Olympic Games:

Not for the faint of heart.

Sunday, April 7, 2019

Kindness In The Dock

     The thrilling, senses-befuddling third installment of the “Kindness” stories has arrived…


Kindness In The Dock

     “What do you think?” Tenderfoot murmured. “Will he be re-elected?”

     “By his constituents?” Scheisskopf said. “Without a doubt. He’s the most popular man ever to emerge from Querendon. Will he be reinstalled as premier? Not bloody likely.”

     “The tenor of the country was difficult to judge,” Tenderfoot said, “before he was made prime minister. It’s a completely different complexion today. If the office were awarded by popular vote—”

     “Which it isn’t,” Scheisskopf said, “and thank God for that small blessing.”

     “—he’d probably get ninety percent of the tally.” Tenderfoot shook his head. “I can’t grasp it. Parliament is against him. The media are against him. His own party is against him. Yet he keeps winning.

     “Other autocrats have done the same,” Scheisskopf murmured.

     “Usually by mowing down their adversaries with machine-gun fire,” Tenderfoot countered. “He hasn’t done anything of that sort. The voters, may God bless the noisy little simpletons, are in love with him. They haven’t the faintest conception of their own interests.”

     Scheisskopf allowed himself a small smile. “And we do, Frank?”

     “Enough of one to fan-dance it for our constituents, at any rate,” Tenderfoot said. “He tells them the exact opposite of what they want to hear. He tells them he’s resolved on policies that will bring dislocations, privations, suffering…and they applaud! They swallow it down and clamor for more.”

     “Give the man his due,” Scheisskopf, “he also tells them that there’s a better future ahead if they’ll only be patient. He’s enough of a politician for that.”

     “And when it doesn’t arrive?” Tenderfoot countered. “It hasn’t, you know.”

     Scheisskopf shrugged. “Perhaps our sense of matters is not the one that matters most.”

     The bailiff rose. “Deputies of the Commonwealth of Erehwon, honorables all,” he boomed out, “John Whiteman, the Member from Querendon, by the will of His Grace the King and by your choice the Prime Minister of the realm, begs leave to address you.”

     The gathering rose to its feet as the premier stepped to the lectern.


     Whiteman scanned the throng for a long moment before speaking.

     “Honorable colleagues,” he said, “I am here for a solemn purpose. The time will soon be upon us to face our constituents. The majority of you have stood for re-election, as have I. If history is any indication, the great majority of you will be returned here. Though you chose me to head the administration, over the two years just past you have consistently opposed every one of my initiatives and legislative proposals, often all the way to the High Court. It is a state of affairs that has caused me to wonder whether our aspirations for our nation are truly in concert.

     “To be effective, the chief executive of our realm must be able to govern with the cooperation of the legislature. This chief executive has not had such cooperation. Rather, I have had to wheedle, to cajole, and to bargain with you all over every proposal I have ever made. It has been a wearing experience, good neither for me nor for our nation. Therefore I feel that with the election only two weeks distant, it is time to resolve whether you will have me as Prime Minister for the two years to come.”

     A muted gasp rose from the assembly.

     “What is he doing?” Scheisskopf whispered.

     “Haven’t an earthly,” Tenderfoot returned, “but somehow I doubt we’ll like it much.”

     “It is pointless,” Whiteman said, “for a nation to have a premier who cannot govern it. While that doesn’t capture our current condition in all particulars, it comes acceptably close to it. Moreover, it is debilitating for such a chief executive to know that no matter how he may struggle and strive, he cannot command majority support for his policies from the legislature. Therefore I rise today to call for a vote of no confidence in His Majesty’s government, of which I am the head. Let the proposition be put to you as we are gathered today: Shall the Whiteman government continue on for a second term, with John Whiteman at its head?” He smiled. “I call the question.”

     “This makes no sense!” a member from the capital district shouted. “The election could turn you out no matter what we might say!”

     Whiteman nodded. “Indeed it could, and it might. But if my surmises prove accurate, you, my fellow members, will remain near to uniformly in your seats. If so, we may neglect the possibility of an electoral reversal. Besides,” he purred into the microphone. “ought we not to give our voters a sense for what their government will be before they decide whether to continue us in our offices?”

     An unnatural stillness gripped the chamber. Whiteman waited in silence.

     “So moved and called,” the bailiff boomed out. “Is there a second to the member’s motion?”

     A figure from the back of the chamber rose. “Aye,” he grated in a rheumy voice. “I second it.”

     Whiteman turned to the bailiff. “Bailiff,” he said, “I request a formal tally.”

     “The bastard,” Scheisskopf whispered. “He’s going to have us on record before the election about whether we intend to remove him!”

     Tenderfoot nodded mutely.

     “Then let a formal tally be taken,” the bailiff called out. “All those voting in the affirmative, please insert your member’s card into the slot outlined in green. Those voting in the negative, please insert your card into the slot outlined in red. You have three minutes to register your preference.”

     Whiteman turned to gaze up at the tally board as the system counted the votes. They came in slowly.

     Tenderfoot fumbled out his card. He stared down at the tally box for a long moment before sliding the card into the green-bordered slot. The registration light lit at once. He removed the card, returned it to his pocket, and glanced at Scheisskopf.

     The foreign minister did likewise. His mask of agony was a terrible thing to see.

     The closing gong sounded. Four hundred fifty-nine pairs of eyes fixed themselves to the tally board.

     “The tally is taken and recorded,” the bailiff boomed. “Four hundred fifty-nine votes aye to zero votes nay. The motion is carried.”

     Whiteman bowed to the gathering. “Thank you, fellow members.” He stepped down from the dais and exited the chamber.


     Whiteman had been back at his desk in the Icosahedron Office for about twenty minutes when Scheisskopf and Tenderfoot appeared to request his attention. He smiled, invited them in, and told them to sit.

     “What can I do for you gentlemen today?” Whiteman purred.

     “Mister Prime Minister,” Scheisskopf said, “by your actions this morning you have pre-empted one of the Deputies’ most important functions: the choice of an executive administration. Now regardless of the electoral outcome—”

     Whiteman nodded. “The odds are overwhelmingly in favor of my continuation in this office,” he said. “That was the point, Lane. Anyone else the party might place here would all but certainly reverse my administration’s policies, all of which have proved immensely popular.”

     “Based on a lot of Promised-Land nonsense,” Tenderfoot ventured, “most of which hasn’t come near to reality.”

     “No?” Whiteman smiled. “Our borders are secure. The influx of ‘refugees’ has ceased. Those who arrived before I became the prime minister have nearly all been repatriated. The budget, at long last, has been balanced. Taxes have been reduced and stabilized. Our friends in the permanent government have had their teeth largely pulled. And so private citizens can walk about in something approaching safety, can keep a decent slice of their earnings, and can operate their enterprises, and perhaps start a few new ones, without having to fend off bureaucrats and QUANGOs from dawn to dusk. The people seem to like it, though I’m sure there are some, notably here in the capital, who would differ. Perhaps you do, Frank?”

     Tenderfoot grimaced but held his tongue.

     “Well then,” Whiteman said, “why should your constituents, among whom I seem to be as popular as I am among my own, not be allowed to know how you feel about my premiership?”

     “It was a violation of our traditions!” Scheisskopf exclaimed.

     “True!” Whiteman said. “But so was the Supreme Charter, back when it was ratified. So was the Declaration of Common Rights and Protections, a few centuries afterward. And so is the recent tendency among our colleagues in Parliament to hide their true intentions while promising to do the exact opposite. That particular violation, gentlemen, has troubled me more and longer than you know.”

     He rose and went to the picture window that gazed upon Central Boulevard. The commerce of Erehwon flowed steadily over that great avenue, yet with a curious sedateness. It was as if the tensions of the most recent decades had been bled from the land, that commoners might relax and enjoy their lives in peace and security.

     “I look out this window daily,” Whiteman said, “and I reflect upon the lives that pass it. The little men, the men who wield tools and make things. The men who are Erehwon, as we are not. For what are we, gentlemen? What is our true significance? One of our countrymen once wrote in a novel that we are deemed important only because the papers daily say so. He was more right than wrong, I think. And it is time—past time, really—that we should cease to imagine ourselves as important beyond the stature of those little men. Time we should cease to believe what the papers say about us.

     “A playwright with whom you may be familiar had one of his greatest characters proclaim, albeit to himself alone, that ‘I must be cruel, only to be kind.’ I have followed such a course, and until a few months ago the cruelty did out-mass the kindness. But the tide has turned, gentlemen. Erehwon is headed upward again. And your constituents are aware of it.” He spread his arms in an encompassing gesture. “Perhaps you are too…but it will make no odds if you fail to acknowledge it. Now, if you please, I have a great many matters to attend to.”

==<O>==

That universal franchise thing.

The alien ideological pollution of our electorate has gone beyond the point of no return. A whole new paradigm must be constructed and implemented.

Essentially, the voting demographic must be changed because a democratic system whereby a universal franchise is automatically awarded to all and sundry irrespective of ability, intent or right to exercise that prerogative in the best interests of the nation state will always fail in the long run.[1]

It's holy writ in the West that "the people" must weigh in on all matters and that everyone with a pulse should exercise the franchise. Convicted felon? Yes. Illiterate? Sure. Welfare recipient? You bet. Resting in your grave? Of course. Vote twice. Foreigner? The best.

America in particular is fanatically committed to the proposition that politicians must be able to acquire power by appealing to the intellect and passions of the lawless, the subversive, and the drooling moron. The Democrats wet their pants at the prospect of having third-world invaders be given a "path to citizenship" so that low-IQ, dysfunctional people with absolutely no clue about American concepts of citizenship or our traditions can cancel out the votes of white Americans. Citizenship here being as precious as a 50-lb. sack of dog food.

The electorate.
As Seneca states, the voting demographic has got to change. The solid, productive whites of America and the West are too far gone to be able to summon up the will or the sense to act in their self interest.

The "alien ideological pollution," namely the pollution of sappy liberalism and ultra-left worship of total revolution, make it mandatory that the freak, the foreign, the criminal, and the parasite are considered the crown jewels of earthly existence.

We will, hence, run the ship aground on the rocks of that. Utter lunacy.

Notes
[1] "And the Debacle Continues." By Seneca III, Gates of Vienna, 4/6/19.

Saturday, April 6, 2019

Concerning Illogical Puzzles

     If you liked the previous piece, you’ll enjoy this one:

     Some years back, a Marine colonel-instructor was walking along the beach with a young second lieutenant when he halted them both to pose a difficult command question to the young man:

     “Lieutenant,” the colonel said, “imagine that a Russian submarine has just pulled up onto this beach and immediately disgorged fifty armed fighters. You’re the senior officer present. What would you do?”

     The young lieutenant snapped to attention. His response was immediate and definite:

     “Sir! I’d blow ‘em into the water with concentrated mortar fire, sir!”

     The colonel was impressed with the young lieutenant’s speed and decisiveness in the face of a sudden lethal threat, and said so. Then he thought a moment more.

     “Wait just a minute there, son. Where’d you get those mortars?”

     But the young lieutenant was prepared for that thrust as well:

     “Sir! Same place you got the sub, sir!”

     I hope that young man went far in the Marine Corps.

A Puzzle In Illogic

     A couple of days ago, a friend sent me the following, which was apparently an interview question somewhere:

     You’re driving your car on a stormy day. You pass by a bus stop and see three people waiting there. The first is the perfect woman of your dreams. The second is an old friend who once saved your life. And the third is a lonely old lady who looks really sick. If you only had one seat in your car, who would you offer a ride to?

     God only knows what this question is supposed to test for, but it was apparently meant seriously. But I think I’d have had a lot of trouble with it, because I immediately started thinking along these lines:

     “I can’t leave the friend with the girl of my dreams, because he’s a womanizer and will run off with her. And I can’t leave the girl of my dreams with the old lady, because she’ll start telling Dream Girl about all the horrible things men have done to her. But I can leave the friend with the old lady. So I take the girl of my dreams.

     “Take her where? To a bus terminal with a roof and connections everywhere, of course! Then I go back for the friend, take him to the terminal, take Dream Girl back to the stop where I found her, and pick up the old lady. I take the old lady to the terminal, and finally I go back for Dream Girl and take her to the terminal. Now they can all get to wherever they're going, and I can get back on the road. Problem solved!

     “What’s that? Don’t I try to romance the girl of my dreams? Don’t I even ask for her number?? Of course not! I’m a married man. What would my wife think?”

     Age does funny things to the brain, doesn’t it?

Kindness In Diplomacy

     So many people have written to say such nice things about this piece that I thought it might bear up under a brief extension….


Kindness Goes International

     Foreign Minister Lane Scheisskopf was plainly upset. As there could only be one reason, Whiteman had to repress a smile. He’d known it was coming; the only uncertainty was how soon it would arrive.

     “Mister Prime Minister,” Scheisskopf ventured, “while your refugee policy has admittedly quelled the problem for us domestically, there have been…other consequences.”

     Whiteman nodded. “I assume those consequences are pertinent to your area of responsibility, Lane?”

     “They are, sir.”

     “Well,” Whiteman said, “other nations were never guaranteed to approve of our domestic arrangements. As long as they confine themselves to verbal criticism, I think we can endure it.”

     “Sir, some of them are speaking openly of retaliatory measures.”

     “Of what sorts?”

     “Tariffs and trade barriers.”

     “Ah!” Whiteman allowed his expression to brighten. “What does our nation import from them, Lane?”

     “Sir?”

     “Come, come! What goods does our country import from those countries? More to the point, how would our people and our economy be affected by the absence of those imports?”

     Scheisskopf was deeply flustered by the inquiry. “Sir, I’m not prepared with that information.”

     “Are you prepared to say which of our domestic industries would be affected by the inability to export to those nations?”

     “No, Mister Prime Minister,” Scheisskopf mumbled. “I’m not.”

     “Hmph.” Whiteman rose from his desk, went to the little bar built into the north wall, and poured himself two fingers of Calvados. “A drink, Lane?”

     “No thank you, sir.”

     “You know,” Whiteman said after a sip, “if you were prepared with that information, it would be a significant datum. It would mean that the consequences of a trade skirmish with those countries would be widely felt, and perhaps deeply enough that our people would feel some pain. As that’s not the case, allow me to say that I’m unconcerned over the matter. Was there anything else?”

     “Yes, sir,” Scheisskopf said after a moment. “The ambassadors of Dumbfuckistan and Upyourassov have urgently requested to meet with you. Today, if possible.”

     Whiteman finally allowed himself to smile. “Of course it’s possible, Lane! I’d be delighted to chat with them. Where are they at the moment?”

     Scheisskopf glanced at his watch. “At this time, sir, I imagine they’d be at their respective embassies.”

     “Well, ring them up! Tell them I’d be happy to see them here, at any time today. But together, Lane. Together only.” Whiteman waved an arm. “My time is limited, but as the refugees could tell you, my hospitality is boundless.”

     Scheisskopf winced, nodded, and departed.


     Whiteman didn’t hear from Scheisskopf until late that afternoon. He sensed that Ambassadors Jihadiki and Jerkovich had wanted one-on-one time with him and were resisting the notion of meeting with him together. But at about four his secretary announced that they had presented themselves as he suggested. The two trooped into the Icosahedron Office, with Scheisskopf in the lead.

     Whiteman remained seated as they entered. “Well, gentlemen? What is it?”

     Both ambassadors bridled at the expression of disdain. They were accustomed to the treatment Whiteman’s predecessors had given them as respected representatives of sovereign states. To be treated as mere supplicants grated on both men’s self-esteem. Scheisskopf was equally upset at the blatant disregard of the diplomatic courtesies, but he kept silent.

     It was Jihadiki who spoke first. “Prime Minister Whiteman, we must protest your treatment of our citizens in the strongest possible terms. What you have done amounts to incarcerating them as criminals, treatment that is explicitly forbidden by the bylaws of the World Council on Refugee Resettlement!”

     “Surely, Ambassador,” Whiteman purred, “you’re aware that my nation is not a member of that council? That we reject its assertions of authority and have never agreed to any of its emissions?”

     “We are,” Jihadiki said, “but—”

     “Then you may consider that point to have been dealt with and dismissed with prejudice, Ambassador.” Whiteman paused and looked off theatrically. “Did I hear you say a moment ago that you were here to protest our treatment of your citizens?

     The Icosahedron Office grew strangely silent. Scheisskopf’s look of anxiety intensified still further.

     Presently Jihadiki said “I meant to say that—”

     “What you did say is what concerns me, Ambassador.” Whiteman chose that moment to rise from his desk and cross his arms over his chest. “Which of your citizens have I mistreated, and when and where?”

     Jihadiki merely glared. Whiteman nodded as if the ambassador had confirmed an important supposition for him.

     “You mentioned refugees in the same sentence with your citizens, Ambassador,” Whiteman said. “From that I infer that the citizens you’re concerned about are in our refugee detention center. Is that or is that not the case?”

     Jihadiki drew a deep breath. “It is, Mister Prime Minister.”

     Whiteman smiled. “Well, in that case,” he said, “I’ll happily order them transferred to your custody—if you’re willing to take personal responsibility for transporting them directly back to your nation. Otherwise, I’m afraid they’ll have to stay in the detention center. They did arrive here illegally, you know.”

     “There is no such thing,” Jerkovich grated, “as an illegal refugee in international law.”

     “And what makes you think,” Whiteman said, “that I have the least concern with ‘international law,’ Ambassador? By conforming to the ‘international law’ of which you speak, the nations of Europe have found themselves overrun by savages that are rapidly destroying their continent. Present trends continuing, twenty-five years from today Europe will be a Third World hellhole indistinguishable from Dumbfuckistan and Upyourassov.” He grinned viciously into their shocked faces. “Why else would the flow of refugees be exclusively from your countries to mine? Did you think I would put a happy gloss on something so obvious, as a gesture of respect to you?

     It took a moment for Jerkovich to find his voice, but when he did it came out at volume.

     “Your attitude toward a sovereign nation is intolerable!” Jerkovich roared. “When I have informed my president there will be repercussions that will rock your nation to its knees.”

     Whiteman shrugged. “Such as?”

     Jerkovich opened his mouth to continue, but closed it without speaking. He glared daggers at Whiteman, who merely smiled.

     Presently Whiteman said “Unless you’re contemplating military action against us, I’m unconcerned with any ‘repercussions’ you have in mind. And if military action is on your agenda, allow me to state quite explicitly that a fifth of our navy could beat the snot out of the whole of yours and be home in time for lunch.” He turned to Jihadiki “I hope your nation isn’t about to make any such threats. I’d be unable to restrain my laughter.”

     There was a thump from the far side of the room as Scheisskopf fainted and collapsed.

     “Never have the representatives of civilized nations been treated so rudely!” Jerkovich screamed. “You will regret this!”

     Whiteman shrugged again. “I don’t think so. But I will refrain from comment on your implication that your two nations are ‘civilized.’ Now, gentlemen, was there anything else? Anything of substance? I do have a country to govern, you know.”

     After a few seconds’ silence he pressed the button that would summon his security detail to escort them out.


     That was fun. And yes, I think there’ll be a third installment. Stay tuned!

A giant helping of reality.

Cliff Notes version: You ain't jack, sunshine. The Constitution has been tossed and we've got us here a gigantic federal government with the bit between its teeth. That ship done sailed. If the political system happens to have served your interests in some way last month, rest assured it was a mistake and it will shortly be rectified. And that issue that vexes you so? Wellll, this time, Charlie Brown[1], it will be different. But your congressman is dying to hear from you and his 599,999 other constituents. He really is.

The article, upon which the following comment was made, is illuminating as it makes crystal clear the banker-insider lock on the legislative process by means of which they were able to destroy the livelihood of small foreign exchange traders in the U.S. Small Forex traders may not mean much to you but the ones who ended up with all the cheese were the biggest banks and the likes of George Soros. Surprise, surprise. So the bell tolls for us schlubs as well.

It's also pretty clear about the corruption of the Clinton bribe-taking foundation and the useless oversight mechanism supposedly established to scrutinize foreign dealings that impact our national security. National security is a quaint concept these days and it most certainly does not include closing our borders to and deporting foreign invaders. Are you nuts?

From this standpoint, commenter jfhandk's kind-of-out-there views hardly seem that odd, but maybe that's just me:

When you have absolute power, you can get away with just about anything.

Don't forget the Dim's infatuation with satanism, pedophilia, fagotry and islam, to name a few.

And [there's] even [the trifling matter of] treason to try to falsely remove a presidential candidate and ultimately a sitting POTUS.

We can safely assume that virtually all Dims, and most pols, are double-agents, getting paid (off) by organised crime or foreign powers.[2]

What is inaccurate about his first point, pray tell? If open borders aren't the grossest betrayal that a political elite can visit on a nation what are they exactly? Most white people are outraged by open borders but the Great White Hope of Our Time has been totally stymied -- if he's not a conscious agent or captive of the immigration lobby (which point I am prepared to argue). But the Treason Class couldn't care less about what whites think. They have an absolute lock on the political process and public sentiment means nothing. Yes, Trump upset them terribly but he was and is a fluke and matters will be rectified by two or six more years of ethnic inundation and Dems paying more attention to the basics, such as vote fraud and Electrical College realities.

Tony Podesta taste in art.
If, by any chance, you think jfhandk's second sentence is a bit much, then consider this stomach-churning piece by Diana West.

As for his third sentence, well, the Deep State/Dems/prog commie Never Trumpers HAVE gotten away with treason. NOWHERE has Trump ever directly addressed the matter of an attempted coup. He's talked about "collusion" and issued general denials thereof but he's never addressed the American people and discoursed in plain words about this coup. (Same with the invasion over the southern border. It will be a cold day in hell before Trump utters the word "invasion." He WILL NOT plant his colors in the rich ground of Art. I, Sect. 4.) If Trump won't name the crime, let's not lose sleep over any odd failure to deal with insurrection, treason, or invasion.

Jfhandk's last sentence is inaccurate only because he needlessly limits his scorn to Dims, where it's clear we are dealing with bipartisan betrayal at every turn. Paul Ryan and the late aisle-crosser from Arizona come to mind.

Other comments by Utopia Planitia and ComeAndTakeIt are illuminating in a disturbing sort of way. The former describes the engine of decline exactly – destruction in the name of grasping for political power. The latter speaks of the Democrats as being part of a communist cult where "reason, logic and independent thought are not in the equation" and a hearty handshake for any who can prove him wrong.

Notes
[1] For my readers in Ulan Bator, Charlie Brown was a cartoon character who always believed his friend Lucy Brown when she said she would hold the football properly so he could kick it. She always lied but he always believed her.
[2] Comment by jfhandk on "How the Democrats Ruined my life and made me a Libertarian." By globalintelhub, ZeroHedge, 4/5/19.

Friday, April 5, 2019

Things Not To Do

     I suppose learning really does continue lifelong. These past sixty-seven years I’ve learned a few useful tidbits, of which the most useful have generally been the “things not to do.”

     There are many things one should not do. There are a fair number of things one must not do. I have a list, and I add to it when the occasion presents itself. And you, Gentle Reader, being a patron of Liberty’s Torch, would probably agree with me on the great majority of them.

     There’s a new entry on the Must Not Do list. It arrived there just a little while ago. It’s simply stated but terrible of effect:

The old know things that the young must not be allowed to hear.

     I should have known before this. I should have…


     About twenty-five years ago, the C.S.O. and I had another family, the Hudsons, come to dinner at the Fortress: husband, wife, and two teenaged children. It was a pleasant evening, and dinner, cooking being the C.S.O.’s forte, was enjoyed by all. We were past the entrée and enjoying dessert when one of the teens, a charming young lady whose name was Kristin, asked a question of me that, as the saying goes, “brought down the house:”

     “Fran, what would you say is the biggest difference between teens and adults?”

     Kristin’s parents were immediately alert. Mind you, I wasn’t known in their household as some fount of eternal wisdom. Hell, I’m not known that way in my own household. But as you may have noticed, I do have opinions, and I tend to dispense them freely. Moreover, the way Kristin asked the question suggested 1) that she seriously wanted to know my opinion, and 2) that her parents had not provided an answer she found satisfactory. So I took the question seriously, and I decided to answer it seriously:

     “Well, Kristin, I’d say it’s what they’re most concerned about. Teenagers tend to be most concerned about sex. But as you get older, you tend to be less concerned about sex and more concerned about money.”

     You could have heard a pin drop. Kristin’s face lit as if I’d provided the Great Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything. On the other hand, I think her parents would have looked less shocked if I’d hopped onto the table and dropped my pants. Plainly, by their lights this was something Kristin should not have heard from a respected elder. And yet it was my honest opinion. I believed it then and I believe it today.

     The get-together ended a few uncomfortable minutes later.


     I participate in a few of the newer social-media sites., mostly as a way of promoting Liberty’s Torch. However, if you’ve looked into those sites you’d find a phenomenon that evokes a certain wry amusement from most older men: younger women fishing for various things from us – usually money -- using direct messages and sexy come-ons. A few such women have approached me, even though it says in my profile that I’m a married Catholic born in 1952. It puzzles me, but there it is.

     As I’m alone most of the time, the chance to chat with someone is a refreshing break from whatever I’ve been doing (usually reading or writing). Young, old, male, female doesn’t matter. Until you reveal yourself as a grifter, I’ll talk to you about whatever you’d like.

     These past two days one such young woman, whom I’ll call Mary, kept up a stream of chatter that was diverting (though only intermittently grammatical), and seemed light and innocent enough, except for her less-than-subtle suggestions that we should meet and have what our British cousins would call “a bit of fun.” But about an hour ago that changed:

Mary: Are there any things that you just can't live with or live without?
FWP: Well, I'd hate to lose my eyesight. I enjoy a lot of music, and I'd hate to lose that. But you know, we all lose EVERYTHING sooner or later.
Mary: What are your goals and dreams for the future?
FWP: Write a few more books. That's about all.

     Not exactly shocking from an old retiree who writes novels, eh? But things took an unfortunate turn from there:

Mary: Good will you write about us??
FWP: What would I write about us? That I was chatting with this young woman hundreds of miles away who wanted to know if I’ve ever cheated on my wife? Not much of a story there.
Mary: Haha, you're very funny.

     That’s when I did a Big Bad Thing:

FWP: Do you know what's not funny at all, Mary? Being old. Facing the end of life. Realizing that you'll die soon...and that no one will miss you. Knowing, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that nothing you've done has made a significant difference to anyone. That's the Big Not-Funny.

     I know that “you could have heard a pin drop” image doesn’t translate to conversations conducted in text sent over the Web, but it’s the best I can do.


     Philip K. Dick once wrote that for any living person, there is a string of words that will heal him of his wounds and a string of words that will kill him. Perhaps he had this sort of disclosure in mind. For there are things the old know that only the old should know. Knowledge that can ruin the life of a younger person. Knowledge that will drain him of all hope and joy. Knowledge that will forever after color everyone and everything he sees, no matter where or when:

     Whenever you feel, as you always do, that everything is going wrong and you’re about to be annihilated, turn to your death and ask if that is so. Your death will tell you that you’re wrong; that nothing really matters outside its touch. Your death will tell you, “I haven’t touched you yet.” – don Juan Matus, by way of Carlos Castaneda

     We must not tell them.

Think I’ll Do A Little More Angry

     Enjoy the following political wet dream:

To Kill With Kindness

     John Whiteman, Prime Minister of a First World nation that shall go unidentified for obvious reasons, recently announced a change to his country’s “refugee” policies. He can’t change the law, but he can change how it’s observed in practice – and he has. Immediately afterward, he addressed a group of “refugees” that made it to his nation’s shores:

     “Refugees, eh? Yet more than ninety percent of you are young men, all of you look healthy, and it looks like most of you have smart phones. What are you running from, the fathers of the girls you knocked up?

     “According to our laws, we have to house you ‘refugees’ here…but only until we can return you to your home countries in safety. So here’s the deal: you’ll be living in tents, in this compound, which you won’t be permitted to leave. There'll be no WiFi, no electricity, and no entertainment of any kind. Yes, there’ll be food and water, but we won’t care about your opinion of the food, and water will be all you get to drink. Clothes? What’s wrong with the clothes you’re wearing?

     “The compound is surrounded by crew-served machine gun emplacements that are continuously manned. Anyone who tries to scale the fence will be shot down, no questions asked. His neighbors can dispose of his body; we certainly won’t want it.

     “For extra security, you’ll all be wearing ankle monitors. Very special ankle monitors: if you cut through the band that holds them on, they explode. Guaranteed amputation of your lower leg. If one of you is detected outside the compound, he’ll be tracked down and executed wherever he’s found, again no questions asked. Yes, kids too. Some of you ‘teenagers’ have mighty impressive beards.

     “We aren’t interested in hearing any demands from you. In fact, the very first demand any of you makes will get all of you loaded onto a raft and dragged a mile out to sea. Think you could make it back?

     “Whoever survives this regime will be returned to his homeland when we think it’s safe. You won’t get a vote. After all, we didn’t get one when you decided to leave, and fair’s fair.

     “So make yourselves at home! Those of you whose phones are working should call your buddies back in Dumbfuckistan and tell them about the conditions here. Especially you should tell them about the size of this compound – the fixed size of this compound. No matter how many ‘refugees’ arrive here, they’ll all be confined to the space you occupy now. No enlargement will be considered.

     “Have a nice day!”

     Prime Minister Whiteman considered his task accomplished and returned to his desk in the Icosahedron Office. He’d been there barely a minute before his secretary began to bombard him with messages. All of them were from members of Parliament. They were unanimously upset. Angry minorities among their constituents were bombarding them with complaints that ranged from decorous protests to death threats.

     Whiteman had a uniform response to those calls: “Ignore the protests. I have defined the policy, and I intend to enforce it. See to it that the law is enforced in your constituency, and leave mine to me.”

     Over the next three days the cascade of complaining parliamentarians dwindled to a trickle and then ceased altogether. There were scattered reports of angry street protests, which Whiteman ignored. A couple featured low-level violence. The prime minister directed the relevant police forces to enforce the law without fear or favor, and they did so. After a week there were no more protests.

     Whiteman reviewed the reports from the “refugee” compound each morning. For a week there were no hints of difficulty; the “refugees” appeared to have accepted their lot. The absence of any discord made him increasingly suspicious. He ordered a doubling of the guard force.

     Then came the escape attempt.


     “How many dead?” Whiteman said. He did not look up from his paperwork.

     “Twelve.” Interior Minister Frank Tenderfoot was desperate to get the chief executive to alter the “refugee” detention policy. He hoped the announcement that bloodshed had finally occurred would do it.

     His hopes were dashed.

     “Good,” Whiteman said. “That should be enough to get the rest to draw the moral. Was there anything else?”

     “Mister Prime Minister,” Tenderfoot faltered, “aren’t you the least bit concerned about the loss of innocent human life?”

     That brought Whiteman’s eyes up. Tenderfoot was shocked to see him smile.

     “Not at all, Frank,” the prime minister said. “First, by definition the escapees were not innocents. They broke parole. They chose to defy the conditions I placed on their refuge. Second, I put the existing policy in place well before they arrived here, so they had no excuse for not knowing what the consequences would be. They chose to doubt my will. That was on them.”

     Tenderfoot was taken aback. He’d known Whiteman to be callous about human rights matters, but he’d never imagined that it would lead to mass bloodshed. He groped for words.

     “Was there anything else, Frank?” Whiteman said. “I am rather pressed, you know.”

     “Mister Prime Minister…” Tenderfoot breathed once deeply. “You should be aware that—”

     “That the Justice Crusaders will be staging a protest right in front of the compound fence later today?” Whiteman shrugged. “I know, Frank. I’ve known since last night. My agents inside that organization reported it to me. As long as they don’t obstruct the gunners’ view of the fences, I’ll have no problem with it. If they do, on the other hand…” Whiteman’s smile became shark-like. “Let’s just say that their troubles will be worse than they can imagine. As will yours.”

     Tenderfoot staggered where he stood.

     “Yes, Frank, I know about your involvement. I’ve known for a while. Good intelligence is vital to a chief executive, especially in this snake pit of a government, so I made it a high priority from day one in this chair. I probably have the best network any PM has ever had. And I will nail you to a cross if your comrades should pose my patrols the least little difficulty. So you should make sure to tell your Justice Crusaders to keep out of the way of the compound guard force. I can trust you to see to that, can’t I?”

     Tenderfoot stuttered and choked. Presently he shambled out of the Icosahedron Office.


     The next morning’s news coverage was all about the medical condition of Interior Minister Frank Tenderfoot. Apparently he’d been set upon by an angry mob during what the papers called a “gathering of his constituents.” Why that gathering had occurred far outside his parliamentary constituency went unaddressed. Those who attacked him had beaten him savagely, some with clubs. The hospital to which he’d been taken reported him to be in critical condition.

     Whiteman noted the reports and had his secretary send a bouquet to Tenderfoot’s hospital room.

     It was barely nine o’clock when his secretary told him that a large majority of Parliament had demanded that he appear before them at once. He shrugged, buttoned his jacked, and went to the Chamber of Deputies to confront them. When the speaker admitted him, he strode to the lectern, panned a smile around the members, and said, “Well? What is it?”

     The gathering drew a collective breath so sharp that Whiteman could feel a draft flow from him toward them. After a moment, a Member rose pointed an accusing finger at him.

     “Mister Prime Minister,” the Member shouted, “your refugee detention policy has already caused twelve deaths and could well be responsible for the assault on Interior Minister Tenderfoot!”

     Whiteman nodded. “So? What of it?”

     There was a moment of shocked silence.

     “Aren’t you the least bit concerned about these events?” the Member continued.

     “I did not send Minister Tenderfoot into the den of villains where he was attacked,” Whiteman said. “Therefore I have no responsibility for the consequences. As for the fatalities at the refugee compound,” he said, “that was in accordance with policy. My policy. And as long as I have the authority over such matters that the Refugee Relief bill gives me – you did vote for that bill, didn’t you, Arthur? – that policy will not change.”

     The Member was visibly stunned. He’d plainly expected the spilling of blood to force Whiteman to modify his detention policy. He had not dreamed that the prime minister would choose to stand fast.

     “While I’m here,” Whiteman said, “allow me to acquaint you with a few facts. First, the refugees are all fed, watered, and protected from the elements. There have been no reports of violence within the compound. No one has attempted to tamper with the fences or the ankle monitors. Second, statistics on the refugees’ home countries are now generally available, and they point to a single, inarguable fact: They’re better off in the compound, statistically, than they were where they came from. They’re eating twice as many calories per man per day as their compatriots. They’re not subject to political persecution. Not one of them has asked to be repatriated. Yes, twelve did attempt to escape. They paid a price that had been made known to them in advance. It’s my hope that no others will pay it, but that’s up to them. So tell me, Members all: Are you ready to deport them en masse? Because that’s their sole alternative to detention in that compound.”

     Whiteman started to turn and depart the dais, checked himself and turned back to the gathering. “You should also know, Members all, that since I had the compound fenced and guarded as it currently is, not one additional refugee craft has approached our shores. Word has gotten around, it seems. Nearly all of the refugees came equipped with phones, and they sent word to their homeland about the reception they’d received. Inasmuch as controlling he refugee influx, with its accompaniment of crime, welfarism, and other social pathologies, was one of the tasks you set me, I deem the goal achieved.”

     “You’ll be unseated at the next election!” came a shout from the gathering.

     Whiteman smiled. “Will I?” he said. “Perhaps. But perhaps not. Perhaps you gentlemen should consult your constituents before you decide to range yourselves against me. And with that I shall say, as I said to the refugees when I addressed them a week ago yesterday: Have a nice day.”

     And he left the dais to return to his office.


     Likely? Not very. But plausible. The pendulum of public opinion, in First World countries worldwide, is swinging toward that pole. It would be unwise to imagine that Whiteman’s policy simply can’t happen, that popular sentiment would forbid it.

     What if it were it to become policy here in America?

Thursday, April 4, 2019

The Unforgiving And The Innocent

     HOT FLASH: Concerning slavery and interracial animosity, there are things everyone should know – yeah, more “in the land of should” stuff – but few people do:

  • The institution of slavery is as old as recorded human history.
  • Slavery still exists today, though “under cover,” in the Middle East, Africa, and various Indian Ocean societies.
  • Among First World nations, the first to abolish slavery was Great Britain in 1833. The United States followed in 1866. You may recall the unpleasantness that was required to do so.
  • Interracial animosity is a constant of human existence. Attempts to eliminate it have failed wherever and whenever they’re tried.
  • History suggests that interracial animosity is not connected to whether slavery exists or has ever existed in a given locale.

     In other words, the races naturally look upon one another with a degree of suspicion that unfortunate events can elevate to open hostility. Moreover, there are reasons for this: not cultural but biological reasons that are written into the genes of every race.

     White Americans have done their damnedest to eliminate interracial friction. It hasn’t worked – but not because white Americans haven’t given it a sincere effort. Have a look at this, which I snagged from Gab a few days back:

     Ragin’ Dave adds these comments today:

     You can't tell generations of white men that they are everything that's wrong in the world, and expect that they won't group up to defend themselves. To the left, White Men are evilracisthomophobichaternazis, and they've been preaching that sermon for just about my entire adult life.

     Exactly. Now, for any non-whites sincerely interested in reducing interracial tensions, I have a question:

What are YOU going to do about it?

     Ponder that for a bit.


     White Americans have allowed black racialists, in collaboration with the political class, to make us feel guilt for something in which we had no part: slavery. Indeed, most of us have no ancestors who ever owned slaves. The total number of American slaveowners before 1866 was about 30,000. Even if those thirty thousand slaveowners had borne ten children each, and their children and children’s children did likewise, that would amount to only 30 million descendants of slaveowners: less than 10% of today’s population.

     But slavery – more specifically, “the legacy of slavery” — is the hook on which the racial rabble-rousers hang their claims of white oppression of blacks. It’s total nonsense and always has been, even in the South during the Jim Crow era.

     Don’t take my word for it; look it up. American blacks prospered steadily, both economically and socially, from 1866 to 1964: a century of relentless advancement. Husbands were reunited with wives. Families sundered by slavery regathered. Ironically, Southern blacks did better, statistically, than those who relocated to Northern states, even under the Jim Crow regime: the Northern cities to which they moved tended to erect barriers to the trades and new enterprises the migrating blacks would otherwise have entered!

     But racialist demagogues don’t want you to know that. It would take the bread out of their mouths. They also don’t want you to know that by inhibiting productive work and encouraging illegitimacy and fatherless families, the welfare state has done more harm to American blacks than two centuries of slavery could ever have done.

     Racialist demagogues are far more concerned with maintaining their followings and the revenue to their “foundations” than with improving any aspect of race relations. So the crusade to impose unearned guilt on American whites and extract tribute from us through the legal system must continue.

     And people ask where the white identity and white nationalist movements get their impetus. It is to laugh…hollowly, and with many a tear.


     Herbert Stein has famously said that if something cannot continue indefinitely, it will stop. Yes, it’s a disguised tautology, but it’s important nevertheless. American whites have had enough. We’re fed up. We’ll have no more of the blame for racial disparities, racial tensions, and contemporary trends toward the resegregation of the races. We will protect ourselves, our families, our neighborhoods, and our institutions by any means necessary.

     What’s that you say? You’re black and you don’t quite get it? That’s okay. It’s a white thing; you wouldn’t understand.

Pearls of expression.

Heroic Couplet:

Biden, Trump, and Bernie Sanders are all too old to run. Let's hope Julian Castro is being kept out of the limelight now so he can emerge as the Democrat nominee next year.

JD59:

No one with the name Castro will ever be POTUS.

csc61:

They said the same about Barrack Hussein Obama.[1]

Notes
[1] Comments on "Nine Reasons Why You Should Support Joe Biden For President." By Caitlin Johnstone, ZeroHedge, 4/4/19.

Clarke and Dawe - The War in Iraq. Not the Previous One. The Current One.

Funny guys with a great take on the arrogance, cupidity, and stupidity of politicians and corporations. All very droll. Unfortunately, Mr. Dawe has passed away.

Wednesday, April 3, 2019

Deplatforming FOX?

     Words fail me:

     Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives are demanding to know why Fox News did not publish a story prior to the 2016 election about an alleged affair years before between porn star Stormy Daniels and Donald Trump.

     House Committee on Oversight and Reform chair Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) wrote to former Fox News reporter Diana Falzone last month demanding that she turn over any documents relating to Trump’s alleged extramarital affairs.

     An article in the New Yorker last month alleged that Fox News executive Ken LaCorte spiked the story to protect Trump — a claim LaCorte has vehemently denied, saying the story lacked corroborating evidence and that the network was merely practicing responsible journalism, as were other outlets who declined the story.

     Anyone with three functioning brain cells already knew that Cummings is a shameless partisan whore unacquainted with truth and uninterested in justice, but this is a new low-water-mark even for him. Can you imagine the outrage from the Left were a Republican-controlled body to make a similar demand of CNN or MSNBC?

     There is no infamy to which Cummings will not stoop if it offers him a chance to silence an opponent or create a problem for a Republican. And the clincher is this: he’s not alone in his venality. Schiff, Swalwell, and others of the Democrat caucus are just as bad, though I can’t say any of them are worse.

     If Cummings isn’t ejected from office, there’s no justice in politics…and sad to say, owing to racially motivated district definition, he’ll be in Congress until he dies or retires. I hope to outlive him, as I plan to piss on his grave. He calls to mind Hilaire Belloc’s quatrain:

Here richly, with ridiculous display,
The Politician's corpse was laid away.
While all of his acquaintance sneered and slanged
I wept: for I had longed to see him hanged.

Conversations

     The C.S.O. and I take a long weekend, once each year, in New York State’s Finger Lakes region. Each year before we set out, we look for interesting things to do where we’re going (other than tour all the wineries, of course). This year she came up with a new one. “Fran, did you know that the Watkins Glen racetrack will let you take your car onto the track?”

     I was surprised, of course. “Not for a scheduled event?!”

     “Oh, of course not,” she said. “By appointment, from April through October, as long as nothing else is scheduled. Want to try it?”

     I own a Mercedes S550 – 390 hp – and a C6 Corvette – 430 hp – and I love to drive fast, so it sounded tempting. But I sensed a catch. “What are the conditions?”

     “Well,” she said, “there’s a fee.”

     “Yes, anything else?”

     “Oh, a little one,” she said. “You can’t exceed 55 miles an hour.”

     “!!!!!”

     Yet another illustration of a time-tested maxim: If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

What Trump doesn't do.

People give Trump slack because he's locked in a battle royale with the Deep State and The Resistance. He's preoccupied, some say, with the egregiou Russian Collusion battle.

Which is nonsense, of course. Generals have staff officers to identify the size, disposition, capabilities, and intentions of enemy forces and to advise him on what resources he has to defeat the enemy. But to watch Trump you'd swear it's only he and his Twitter account that stand between us and the enemies of truth and decency. He's got the whole federal bureaucracy at his disposal but, no, he's Horatio at the bridge. Just him. He couldn't even order the DOJ to turn over the unredacted documents his allies in Congress were demanding. "Someone should do something" is a locution he's used when it's no one else's responsibility to act, direct, order, or command but his.

Does he have legal counsel? Does he have officials who are charged with enforcement of immigration laws? Does he have a Department of Justice to pursue AntiFa scum? Does he have officials who can advise him about commerce and the deleterious influence of monopolies? Advisers who can tell him what's going on in the realm of ballot integrity? You wouldn't know it by listening to him speak. His grand strategy is a state secret and if he understands the Constitution he's keeping that capability under wraps as well.

What comes from him is a formless mass of half-formed ideas and barely articulate attempts to express simple ideas. It's not deal making that's Trump's forte but his ability to obfuscate and deflect. Is immigration an aspect of American life that has more than one dimension, to wit, the wall and physical barriers to entry? Of course it is and e-Verify is one of the sharpest swords in his closet but he never mentions it and never ever presumes to hold Congress to account for failing to list 10 priority immigration measure that need to be addressed. He's always the passive actor. The one who is on his hind foot all the time as he waits for the next blow to land.

Jared Taylor captures the essence of Trump in the video below. All we got, folks, but AWOL on many vital matters:

Tuesday, April 2, 2019

The Hype - vs. The Reality

We are breathlessly informed that Michelle Obama has broken all sales records for recent biographies - THREE MILLION sold in the first week!!!!!

The article makes it clear that the number the media are using is NOT correct. The publisher has PRINTED slightly over 3 million copies. Around 1.2 million have been reported as "sold". Based on the number of copies that libraries I've checked have available, I'm assuming that the public has - without their direct consent - contributed to these FABULOUS figures. Cleveland Public Library reports 146 electronic copies. The same library system has 91 audiobooks, and 395 hard cover editions. Large print - 109.

As this book just came out, it would seem that the librarians committed to making sure that they as many copies as possible, even before knowing whether their patrons would buy it.

I'm assuming that most high schools also bought multiple copies of the book. With over 122,000 libraries in the country, even a few copies bought by all of them would jump the book to the top of the lists.

What will REALLY tell whether the book was a true success will be the markdowns and returns, as well as the sales in subsequent weeks. I'm gambling on predicting this, but I'd bet that the following weeks will show SHARP drops in sales, as they front-loaded the orders to push it to the top.

Why am I so sure?

Because Amazon is NOT listing the book at # 1, which, if it WAS actually selling as well as they claimed, it would be.

Check out other indicators:



And, look at these reviews! LOTS of them, almost ALL a FIVE-STAR ranking!!!!

That 8% who hated the book? That's 850 people, who REALLY, REALLY hated it. Do you - like me - think it's possible - scratch that, LIKELY - that the almost 10K who loved the book were driven to write their reviews by Interested Parties?

I wrote an honest review for Amazon:
I read this slightly more than 1/2 way. By that point, I had to push myself to go further. Mrs. Obama's early life was unremarkable and without unusual events, other than the OBVIOUSLY hatefilled looks, comments, and inactions of just about EVERY White person she ever knew. The ONLY reason she could identify for their failing to recognize her OBVIOUS talents and intellect was their White skin.
Because.
When I finally gave up on the book was when she mentioned that, "somewhat oddly, both the Democratic front-runner in the primary and the ensuing Republican nominee because embroiled in scandals involving their ex-wives."
ODDLY? Come on, it involved high-level political dirty tricks including UN-SEALING divorce records. It wasn't an accident - it was a purposeful act that used the lowest of the low political actions to get rid of contenders.
I kept reading (I'll never get those hours back), but it was a complete waste of my time.
Don't buy this - Heck, I wouldn't even suggest you borrow it on Kindle Unlimited. Save your money - and your time.

Absolutely Brilliant!

Thales hits the mark today. I urge everyone to Share the link on social media.

What's so special about today's post? It explains the "outrage" - really, Fauxtrage - of the Left, in terms that anyone who ever worked a sales/customer service position can completely understand.

“We’re Better Than That”

     The title phrase has been used, often successfully, to quench a rising wave of opinion that the Right should make use of one of the Left’s weapons. Those weapons include identity politics, pejorative name-calling, double-bind accusations, ridicule, and in general answering the Left’s fire with equal or greater counterfire from the Right. The NeverTrumpRump and “Conservatism, Inc.,” whose members Kurt Schlichter has delightfully christened the “Fredocons,” are especially unfriendly toward the rise of a white identity politics. The notion that white Americans, especially white Christians, should see their race and nationality as a unifying factor, just as do the Negroes, strikes them with a particular horror. “Recognize that which is common to us? Take note of what distinguishes us from those who call us enemies? Forge it into a bond upon which we can rely for mutual support and defense? Unthinkable! We’re better than that.”

     This is a variation on one of the rhetorical gambits I mentioned yesterday. Specifically, it’s the inverse of “It’s the right thing to do.” It attempts to shove the tactic under discussion into an untouchable bin: untouchable because the contents are a priori morally wrong. But are they?

     Clarity is absent from such exchanges. The subject deserves an extended examination.


     It is emphatically not true that “the ends justify the means.” If the means is morally wrong, it cannot be justified by yoking it to “a good cause.” But a means isn’t morally wrong simply because a gaggle of pundits declare it so. It must violate some aspect of the moral order of the universe.

     The matter of identity politics is hard to see in that light. Consider: the great movement of the post-World War II years to establish the legal equality of the races – keep the modifier legal firmly in mind – was a movement that drew its power from white Americans. There were some Negro voices involved in it, most prominent among them Martin Luther King Jr. However, American Negroes alone could not have mustered the political force required to overcome white opposition if whites generally had been averse to their aspirations. There weren’t enough of them, they didn’t command significant social or economic muscle, and they would have been easy to shut out of the political discourse.

     Start from the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which passed handily in both houses of Congress and was signed without resistance by Lyndon Johnson. What happened to disturb the progression from legal racial equality to a consequent harmony of the races?

     The answer, of course, is black identity politics. Racialist “leaders” made the forging of a quarrelsome and demanding black political bloc their modus operandi. They employed threats, bribery, coalition politics, and a number of other methods to imbue American Negroes with the notion that regardless of the CRA, “whitey” would hold them down, relegate them to a peasant class. They spread myths and rumors about CIA drug-running in black neighborhoods and police ever ready to arrest blacks simply for standing on the corner. They demanded ever more handouts, set-asides and preferences in government contracting, and ever greater representation in the bureaucracy. They maneuvered for the formation of solidly black Congressional districts, to guarantee the election of black Representatives…and later on accused whites of defining those districts against the interests of blacks.

     Were those tactics morally wrong? They were certainly ugly, lamentable to witness, but that’s not the same. What’s most important about them was that by creating a black identity movement, which necessitated viewing American whites as enemies, they’ve evoked a white identity movement in reaction, energized to defend American whites from blacks’ predations. The latter could not and would not have emerged without the former!

     White identitarianism is not an aberration but a defensive reaction to a hostile and increasingly militant minority . It will not fade swiftly. The deliberately fomented animosity of American blacks toward whites is too open and too virulent. The resegregation of the races will continue as whites leave heavily “integrated” neighborhoods for all-white enclaves in which they can enjoy a measure of peace and security. While responsible, law-abiding blacks remain immersed in the “whites are the enemy” mindset, defend and support black rabble-rousers, and protect black lawbreakers from justice, there can be no lowering of whites’ guard.


     The universe has strict, self-enforcing laws. One of those laws is that of equilibrium: No force can remain indefinitely unbalanced. Among men, every movement of any kind will elicit a counter-movement that will halt it or worse.

     The mechanisms delineated above have more bearing on political dynamics than notions of right and wrong. Ought we to be “better than that?” In better times, perhaps. But not when our survival, or the survival of our children, is at stake.

Monday, April 1, 2019

Monday Maunderings

     I’m in a lot of pain at the moment – apparently a 67-year-old man isn’t supposed to chase a 200-pound mastiff a half mile down the street and carry him back to his weeping owner, no matter how attractive the owner (or the mastiff) might be – so rather than my usual extended essay replete with assorted archaisms and obscure idioms, have a few tidbits from the Fortress’s cellar.


1. That Incredibly Useful Whipping Boy, The “Alt-Right.”

     A few days ago The Federalist brought us this:

     This week, The Economist, one of the most respected outlets in the world (and arguably one that is fairly centrist), falsely labeled pundit Ben Shapiro as “the sage of the alt-right.” Shapiro, and then seemingly every conservative on social media, expressed outrage at the accusation. Before long, The Economist corrected itself, instead labeling Shapiro a “radical conservative,” whatever that means.

     In this case the misappellation was not just factually incorrect, it was unintentionally cruel. During the 2016 Republican primary when the alt-right came to the fore as shock troops supporting Donald Trump (seemingly without his consent) Shapiro was, perhaps more than any other public figure, a target for their hateful tweets and rhetoric.

     I continue to maintain that the “alt-right” is a fiction in the minds of a few would-be left-wing organizers and a whole lot of commentators hoping to create a sense of alarm about a dangerous sociopolitical movement. There is no visible organization that styles itself as the home of the “alt-right.” There are a few figures spoken of as “leaders” in this supposed movement, but they tend to disagree about just about everything. There’s no political party that promulgates an “alt-right” platform. Wherefore, then, does this constitute a "thing?"

     Those flogging this term do so to slander enemies they wish to assail (cf. Alinsky’s Rules). I’d imagine the NeverTrumpRump is a part of this. Presently the more outspoken nationalist and neonativist figures, Richard Spencer and a few others, will become the focus. Yet Spencer, the most visible person identified as a “leader” of the “alt-right,” has few followers and no perceptible influence on any politician. What would people think of this “movement” were those facts generally known?

     America has enough social and political problems. We don’t need chimeras to chase.


2. The Great Distractor.

     The esteemed Bookworm has a thesis about the sexualization of children, including the promotion of transgenderism among them:

     What’s terrifying about the child transgender movement is that it’s moved beyond the moral degenerates of the entertainment and media worlds. We’ve now reached the point at which governments are rapidly internalizing it and using it to sever the parent-child bond. Last year in Ohio, parents actually lost custody for not being sufficiently supportive of their daughter’s claimed transgenderism. Currently, in Texas, a father is being told that, if he doesn’t get with his ex-wife’s program of insisting that their six-year-old son wants to be a girl, he will lose any access to his son.

     Two years ago, Ontario, Canada, passed a law including gender identity in a panoply of protections the government extends to children. Ontario has been trying to assure parents who are not on board with giving their children hormones that cause cancer or sterility that the government really doesn’t intend to swoop in and take away their children. Instead, it will only take children away if that refusal to acknowledge the child’s new identity causes the child emotional distress — except we all know that the transgender shtick is that denying a child’s transgenderism is itself a form of emotional abuse. Can we say Orwellian language? Meanwhile, in the UK, parents are being told that if they do not let their autistic son have hormone treatments that could damage his body permanently, they will lose custody over him.

     That there is no medical / scientific authority whatsoever for transgenderism, which seems to be a tragic mental illness akin to anorexia or other body dysmorphia problems, only this mental illness is one that the media, education establishment and entertainment world actively encourage. With that in mind, it’s terrifying to watch speed with which the government is weaponizing the transgender world view.

     Bookworm has included the text of a brilliant article she wrote nine years ago on Sex and State Power. Please read it all. It’s a mind-expander. My upcoming novel The Wise and the Mad will also address some aspects of this.


3. Yes, They Want You To Die.

     Herschel at Captain’s Journal has the story:

     Philly.com:
     If you Google the name Jabir Kennedy, you will read about a fugitive wanted for gunning down four men, one fatally, during Christmas week 2017 in the Elmwood section of Southwest Philadelphia. You will read that the “armed and dangerous” fugitive turned himself in a week later and was charged with first-degree murder and three counts of attempted murder.

     That’s all you’ll read about Kennedy, 23, because in a city that typically tallies more than 300 murders and more than 1,000 nonfatal shootings a year, his case quickly disappeared from the news cycle.

     Well, that’s partly because Google sucks, and partly because this is all the information the DA’s office and cops wanted you to know.

     You see, Mr. Kennedy was defending his life against a group of armed attackers, five in number. The D.A. indicted him because – girls, hold on to your boyfriends – he fired too many bullets too accurately!

     Assistant District Attorney Sheida Ghadiri argued during the trial that the gun Kennedy fired belonged to him, that he knew how to use it given that he shot four of the five men he fought with, and the number of bullets he fired — eight to 10 — was too many to be self-defense.

     But a key moment in the trial, Kennedy and Nenner said, came when Ghadiri was cross-examining Kennedy about why he fired repeatedly at the men.

     “Ms. Ghadiri, what did you want me to do?” both recalled him saying. “I don’t understand. You want me to die? You want my mom to come see me with a hole in my head in the middle of the street? That’s not reasonable.”

     The DA’s Office stands by its decision to prosecute Kennedy, said Ben Waxman, the office’s spokesperson.

     If that isn’t enough to pin your outrage meter, I can’t imagine what it would take to do the trick.


4. Another Schlichter Gem.

     Kurt Schlichter strikes the jugular yet again:

     For us actual conservatives, one of the most tiresome aspects of our struggle to retake our country is our never-ending struggle to get the Fredocons who still populate our movement to take our own side in this fight. Exhibit A is the “Conservative Case For XXXX” phenomenon, in which XXXX inevitably equals some liberal goal, objective or obsession. We’re supposed to nod our heads and give in to the progs because, you know, it’s actually conservative somehow.

     Hard pass.

     The latest example is the article “A Conservative Case for Puerto Rican Statehood” that recently ran in National Review for reasons that remain elusive even after reading it. Now, let’s be clear – this is not a column telling National Review or author Kyle Sammin what they can and cannot publish. National Review and author Kyle Sammin should say whatever they want all the time, just as you and I should say whatever we want all the time. This column is about critiquing ideas, bad ideas, like the bad ideas in this particular article, as well as the bad ideas that permeate the whole “Let’s push the conservative envelope” genre. How about we work on taping the conservative envelope back together before we rip it to shreds?

     It’s a must-read, for a single reason: Schlichter asks the question so many ersatz conservatives are afraid will be asked:

What’s in it for Americans?

     This is a disconcerting query for the pseudo-moralists to face. They can’t answer it. Instead they pretend offense and proclaim that “It’s the right thing to do.” Right by what enduring principle of human intercourse? Blank-out.

     Beware anyone who evades discussion with such a maneuver, no matter how pretentiously he’s named his website.


5. The Backlash Is Righteous And The Press Is In Terror Of It.

     Hearken to Don Surber:

     In 2017, the Pulitzer committee gave the national reporting Pulitzer and $15,000 to David A. Fahrenthold of the Washington Post for such stories as, "Trump: ‘I regret’ lewd chat in 2005."

     I thought to myself, they cannot go any lower. They did the next year by awarding the New York Times and the Washington Post a joint national reporting Pulitzer for their Russiagate hysteria with such stories as, "Undisclosed On Forms, Kushner Met 2 Russians."

     Even Joe McCarthy was not that fearful of Russians. He went after communists.

     Now that we know after 500 witnesses and 2,800 subpoenas that there is no evidence of illegal collusion, the president has asked the newspapers to return their Pulitzers. Not a single one of the 20 stories awarded held up after the exhaustive Mueller investigation ended.

     In 2016, the press was complicit in Hillary's inept attempt to keep the people from electing Donald John Trump president.

     They failed.

     For the next two years, the press was complicit in the unconstitutional effort to oust President Trump by any means possible.

     Again, they failed.

     Now the press wants him to drop this.

     Mirabile dictu! The Fourth Estate wants to be allowed to slink quietly away from its major role – some would call it a starring role – in the attempted coup against a duly elected president. That president has compiled a record of astonishing achievements in only two years. Perhaps the “gentlemen of the press” anticipated President Trump’s run of successes; perhaps they only feared it; and perhaps they were, as has been the case for some time now, so deeply in bed with the Democrat Party that they were merely “following orders.” It doesn’t matter. The press co-conspired with some of the least trustworthy, most despicable persons ever to sit in federal offices. They partook in an attempt to reverse an election by fraudulent means – and they did so on the representation that Trump won the election by fraudulent means!

     The ironies are simply too great to be captured. However, the perpetrators and their cat’s-paws are not. Some belong behind bars; others deserve to be bankrupted in slander and libel suits. Will any of that come about? We shall see. But we may be certain of one thing, at least: President Trump, a battler par excellence whose considerable and well-earned pride in his accomplishments has been deeply scored, will not “drop it,” nor should he.

     Trump 2020!


     That’s all for today, Gentle Reader. It’s time to sit on my heating pad and pray for deliverance from the severest back pain I’ve known in decades. See you tomorrow, I hope.

Looks Like There Was Evidence Against a Dem Planning to Run for President

But, no more.

In other conspiratorial meanderings that are running around my head:

What if Jussie Smollett geting a full pass on all charges is tied to the fact that the weenie was gonna spill the WHOLE story if he had to face jail time (which, given the case against him, was looking likely)?

It gets down to two options:

  • Get "rid" of him - hard to do, as you can't be certain he hadn't stashed away the evidence implicating others out of reach
  • Let him skate on all charges
    • Which also means that the case against him has to be buried, because if it is available, it will lead to a Watergate-type buttload of questions
    • So - seal the whole investigation. Can only be accessed if a judge - one not under control of the Dems - OKs it - and, how likely is THAT?

The widespread outrage against the rich parents who bribed, lied, and otherwise played the system to get their dullard kids into Elite colleges has not abated. This is bothering even those people who generally favor the Democratic party.

We need to fan the outrage - not that hard - and add in the Jussie Smollett mess for dessert. Funny how it's the little things that get people pissed.

Not the large outrages. The little, petty demonstrations of Elitist Privilege.

Let them eat cake.



Kim Foxx (no relation) is "Open to an investigation" of her actions.

Translation: Don't worry, homies. I've buried all the connections DEEP. And, threatened those I couldn't persuade nicely.

It's buried - or, the people who know anything WILL be.

The Airport Chick-Fil-A Bans - here's a way to stop them cold.

Here's a link to a sample of the kind of handouts that can be printed before your trip, and distributed throughout the airport. Hand one to other people, if they ask.

Let's spread it around, people. Remember,

Punch Back - Twice as Hard

Guiliani is right about the release. The Dems want the FULL investigation details because it will allow them to spread rumors, innuendo, and flat-out lies around. Why should we pay for the US government to do their dirty work for free?

If they want to find out dirt - true or not - they need to do it themselves.

Saudi Arabia in perspective.

WikiLeaks cables from the US State Department from 2009 revealeddonors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide.” In a 2014 email, published by WikiLeaks, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Saudi Arabia was “providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region.” It has also supplied weapons to IS in Syria.[1]
This is something to keep in mind next time you hear that Iran is the chief sponsor of terrorism in the world.

Notes
[1] 'How does this serve US interests?’ Gabbard slams decision to sell Saudi Arabia nuclear weapons tech RT, 4/1/19.