Showing posts with label miscellany. Show all posts
Showing posts with label miscellany. Show all posts

Saturday, August 22, 2020

One Of Those Odd Coincidences

     A fanciful movie of a few years back, The Core, contained some of the most striking visual imagery I’d seen incorporated into an SF flick in some time. Have a gander at this scene in a “gem cave:” a postulated space about 700 miles below the Earth’s surface, filled partly by jagged nickel-iron crystals and protected by a cobalt shell from the pressure of the magma around it:

     I was impressed by the imagery, and found myself wondering where the director had come up with the idea. Then, just a few days ago, I stumbled upon this electron micrograph of the surface of a kidney stone:

     Quite a resemblance, eh?

Friday, May 15, 2020

Quickies: Words To Deplore By

We’ve confused actors with heroes, currency with wealth, diplomas with intelligence, propaganda with news, indoctrination with education, demands with rights, tyrants with leaders, conformity with diversity, and slander with debate.

It’s a fake world.

— Alice Smith (@TheAliceSmith) May 10, 2020

     She omitted a couple of my pet peeves. But everyone knows I'm an old crank.

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

Questions No One Is Asking Dept.

     Celebrities! They’re everywhere. They occupy perches in every occupation, every hobby or pastime, every walk of life. We hear about them constantly – and that’s not figuratively but literally true for persons who leave their smartphones turned on. those who We can’t seem to get away from them.

     But why? How? And is there a way to exclude them from our lives?

     In our current milieu, one must work very hard, and deny himself a huge percentage of the news and entertainment routinely vended to us, to have even a chance at a celebrity-free day, much less a celebrity-free life. Try it! Go to the doctor’s, dentist’s, hairdresser’s, or cosmetician’s office. What’s available to distract you from your wait? Daytime talk shows obsessed with celebrities! People magazine! Get through your work day, your appointments, and your errands, and return home. What are the odds that your spouse won’t weigh in on you with news about some celebrity that evening? As for the Idiot Box, you’re beaten before you start. The thing exists specifically to deluge you with celebrities, in one form or another.

     Vast, impersonal forces work to confront us with celebrities and their doings at all times. The entertainment industry – in which I include all media, all sports and competitive gaming, news, and how-to programming – has numerous satellites, including public-relations firms, magazines, event planners, bookers, and promoters, Web “presence” engineers, “influencers” (most of whom hope to become celebrities themselves), and so on. These are the engines of celebrity. In many ways it is they who determine who shall become famous and who shall drop into the dust.

     My question of the day: If it were possible to suppress the services those satellites provide to celebrities and would-be celebrities, would the celebrities matter to anyone? Would we have even a concept of celebrity? Bonus question: What would our media do to fill all the vacated hours?

     Discuss!

Monday, December 3, 2018

The Past Is Another Country Dept.

     If you’re around my age, you’ll surely remember the days of AM music radio, before the FM alternatives were well established. You might also remember that pop music in those days could be a bit...strange.

     Oh, we had all the treacly love-pop we have today. We had the beginnings of “protest pop,” though there wasn’t very much of it. But we also had categories that appear to have dwindled away. Whether that’s a good or a bad thing is a matter of taste.

     Here are the categories I have in mind at the moment:

  • Summer Love songs: This morning I awoke with my skull DJ playing Peter and Gordon’s “Yesterday’s Gone,” but my favorite will always be Chad and Jeremy’s “Summer Song.”
  • Teen Death songs: Who can forget the bathos of “Teen Angel” or “Leader of the Pack?”
  • Car and Driving songs: The Beach Boys had hits with “Little Old Lady from Pasadena,” “Little Deuce Coupe,” “Fun, Fun, Fun,” and “My 409,” while Jan and Dean scored with “Dead Man’s Curve.”
  • Surfing songs: Here’s the Beach Boys again with “Little Surfer Girl” and “Surfing USA,” and Jan and Dean with “Surf City” and “Ride the Wild Surf.”
  • Novelty songs: The Playmates’ “Beep Beep,” Sheb Wooley’s “Purple People Eater,” Dave Seville’s “The Witch Doctor,” Bobby Pickett’s “The Monster Mash,” The Searchers’ “Love Potion Number 9,” and Napoleon XIV’s “They’re Coming to Take Me Away, Hahah!” top that list.
  • The Uncategorizable: Chad and Jeremy’s “Rest in Peace,” Strawberry Alarm Clock’s “Incense and Peppermints,” Norman Greenbaum’s “Spirit in the Sky” and “Canned Ham,” and John Fred’s “Judy in Disguise” don’t seem to fit anywhere.

     What varieties of nonsensical but fun pop music come to your mind, Gentle Reader?

Monday, December 11, 2017

Monday Round-up

I've decided to return to posting 3 X a week, with occasional Sundays. I'm going to put all of those "I HAVE to get this off my chest" posts into a summary. If I stop to post on the spot, I'm going to waste a lot of time I really need to get things done: my book, Christmas prep, household organization and cleaning, etc.

Here's one that 'got my Irish up."

Found this on a site called Dangerous.

"Feminist" Tree Toppers? Words fail me. Here's a picture of Beyonce's topper - I WON'T post Serena Williams' terribly top-heavy one.


Because, nothing says feminist icon like boobs and legs on display.

Man, that ISIS is BRAVE - nothing says True Courage like putting out a death threat against a FOUR-YEAR-OLD.

Which is a greater crime:

  • Rape of a minor
  • Calling that rapist an ethnic slur

Friday, November 22, 2013

Marginalia

I'm not going to call the following brief collection of thoughts and rants "assorted." They're just the products of random rambles of thought. Perhaps one of them will punch one of your buttons as well.


The change to Senate rules is just one more step in the severing of the Senate from its original mission: slowing things down. The Seventeenth Amendment began this journey; it will continue on until the Senate is merely a differently-apportioned House. The Founders, who at one point contemplated denying the Senate the power to initiate legislation, are reportedly whirling in their graves.


To allege "racism" when one doesn't get what one wants is a form of bullying. Granted that it can only work with the target's co-operation, it's still just an invocation of undeserved guilt -- and no one who genuinely believes he's earned what he demands would do so.

To allege "racism" as a stroke in a political argument is an act of cowardice. Its sole intention is to preclude argument -- and no one who believes his argument is sound would do so. Take that, Eric Holder.


Data mining has become a wee bit absurd. Recently I started receiving a magazine I never asked for -- indeed, a magazine I didn't know existed -- whose mission is to solicit funding for operatic productions. It developed that its publisher sends it gratis to persons above a certain net worth. But the calculation of "net worth" includes the presumptive market value of one's house. So I'm supposed to sell my house and blow the proceeds funding an opera? Someone needs to get serious.


Inflationists habitually deny that Federal Reserve creation of money to fund the federal deficit really causes prices to rise. But it's well known -- among rational economists, at least -- that as newly created currency and credit penetrates the economy, among the first signs of deterioration is the stretching-out of maintenance schedules and the deferral of "optional" repairs. So how have the supermarket parking lots in your neck of the woods been looking?


I feel a certain sympathy for the Healthcare.gov website engineers. The visible part of the site is the least of its complexities. Non-technologists have no idea of the immense amount of work that goes into the "back end" of such a site: the processing that takes place on the web server to support operations contingent on user input. This is understandable from general observations of the American milieu. Things have gotten too easy for most of us. Most people think potatoes are dug out of large paddies flooded with gravy.


My preferred measure of a nation's degree of freedom is at how many moments in the course of an average citizen's day he's involved with The State, whether consciously or unconsciously. How often is his behavior affected by The State? How often is he breaking a "law," knowingly or not? How much attention does he give to political matters defensively: that is, because not doing so would endanger him, his loved ones, or his interests?

Find an old copy of Herbert Spencer's early opus Social Statics and ponder the chapter on "The Right to Ignore the State." It will reorient your thoughts as no other book I know except Hayek's The Road to Serfdom.


As winter approaches, an old debate has resurfaced here at the Fortress of Crankitude: generator or no generator? Virtually everything in a modern home depends on the availability of electricity, and Long Island's overhead power lines are easily disrupted by our characteristic winter disaster, the "nor'easter." But the cost, plus the lack of natural gas lines on our street, has held us back for several years. The clincher against the idea has been "But how often would we actually use it?"

Just a weekend ago, my wife was drooling over a Tesla. That might tip the argument to the pro-generator side. However, she hasn't yet figured out how she'd get Rufus the Newfus into it:

Rufus is the capping stroke in many a discussion around here.


Do other fiction writers dream about having an affair with a female protagonist? And when it happens, do they admit it to their wives?


If just one more customer representative says "But why don't you write it in [insert language or toolkit of preference here]?" to me just one more time, I'm going to punch him out. I'm the engineer, asshole! I determine the methodology. Your job is writing checks!


The Year of Our Lord 2014 will be my last year as anyone's salaried employee. I've made no secret of it. For at least three years, I've told management above my head that grooming a replacement for me should start immediately. I've repeatedly announced my unavailability-to-come, and have been ignored. Now, with new projects on the horizon that will require several years of highly sophisticated design and group supervision, management has begun to ask "Is your retirement date really firm, Fran? Do you plan to relocate? Or might we be able to get you back as a consultant?"


If you want the true measure of a man, count his enemies. Gauge as best you can the depth of their venom toward him. This is merely an old law of human nature in operation: No one attacks the inconsequential.

No storyteller has come in for more derision than Stephen King. He's shrugged it off lifelong, producing one emotionally evocative, gracefully written novel after another, and in multiple genres, at that. If his work has become a bit patterned in these latter years, one must expect that of a writer as he grows old. We don't get to keep our freshness or inventiveness lifelong. When I hear someone deride King, my rejoinder is usually, "So what have you written lately?"

The most hated columnist in America is the relentlessly genteel and witty Mark Steyn. It boggles the mind that he doesn't have an armed guard around him at all times. It says even more about Mark Steyn, especially given his extraordinary productivity and the unflagging quality of his work. None of his detractors can approach him in either dimension.

To be half as effective a storyteller as King is all I could hope for as a writer of fiction. To be half as effective a commentator as Steyn is the outer limit of my aspirations as a commentator. That having been said, I'd greatly prefer it if I could get to those levels without accumulating the enemies. Are You listening, God? Christmas is coming, You know!

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Three And A Quick Toddle

This is likely to be a day from my personal vision of Hell, so please excuse the following brevities.


1. How serious is the Syrian matter, really?

Possibly not too serious, if one of the Senate's more notable "hawks" can treat it this way:

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., was caught red-handed by a reporter playing a game on his iPhone as his Senate colleagues and top Obama administration officials discussed a strike on Syria at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing Tuesday.

The Republican senator, who met with the White House Monday to discuss the conflict, admitted he was playing the poker game during the hearing after the Washington Post posted a photo of him doing so.

“Scandal!” McCain tweeted from his personal account. “Caught playing iPhone game at 3+ hour Senate hearing - worst of all I lost!”

McCain and fellow GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., announced conditional support for Obama’s plan on a strike on Syria at a Monday press conference, but said any U.S. military strike would need to have the goal of degrading the Assad regime.

Making light of being caught at such a thing doesn't excuse the offense to the seriousness of the subject under discussion...if, indeed, the subject itself is a serious one. But then, John McCain's ability to take anything seriously has been open to question since he first decided to pursue the presidency on the strength of two admittedly unique credentials:

  • Having been shot out of the sky by North Vietnamese anti-aircraft fire;
  • Spending several years in a North Vietnamese prison.

Gee, what an opportunity the American people missed, eh?


2. Obeying the law is no excuse.

"Excuse me?" I hear you say. "Did you bungle that quote, Fran?"

Not a chance, bro:

SAN ANTONIO -- An "open carry" demonstration outside of a local Starbucks was broken up by police after passersby complained about the three men and their rifles.

The demonstrators, who posted a video of the entire encounter to YouTube, claim they were within their legal rights.

According to Texas law, this type of conduct isn't illegal as long as the weapon is not loaded.

However, San Antonio police Chief William McManus explained that the gun holder can still be charged with disorderly conduct if anyone, at any point, feels threatened.

"It's a disorderly offense that officers will address accordingly," McManus said.

[Citation courtesy of Sara Noble.]

Penal law was once based on a simple rule: Does the cited action cause harm, or a likelihood of harm, to unconsenting others? The modern tendency is to replace the word harm with offense.

That this should have happened in Texas, of all places, makes it plain how thoroughly the police have been mobilized against the citizenry and the rights of the private citizen...and how critically important it is to halt this progression and reverse it before it can go further.


3. Well, we dodged one bullet, at least.

John Kerry came within about three million votes -- actually, more like 150,000 votes, as all he needed was to take Ohio -- of becoming president of these United States. We can be thankful that:

  • He failed at that attempt;
  • He's no longer a United States Senator;
  • We have Rand Paul, one of the best men currently in public office, to show him for what he is.

Yes, yes, we have to endure his depressing puss and lugubrious ramblings as Obama's Secretary of State, but once you've installed Obama in the Oval Office, that's on the order of a mosquito bite to a machine-gunning victim. Besides, with a little luck we can arrange to have Kerry's "diplomatic" duties keep him out of the country most of the time, right? Right?

And that's all for today, Gentle Reader.

Saturday, August 31, 2013

Miscellany And Errata

Because sometimes, you just gotta say, "What the fuck," right? Right?


First, and irrelevant to most Gentle Readers, so please excuse the deferral of today's parade of trivia:

WIFWA is now open for business.

I must express my great gratitude and tremendous appreciation for the efforts of WIFWA's Webmaster, Steve Sumner -- Don't laugh; he's a real person, not the fictional politician from Shadow Of A Sword, and yes, the coincidence is almost too great to be true, but really! -- who took it upon himself to create and configure the WIFWA site, entirely as a labor of love.

Indie fiction writers, your hour is upon you. It's time to put your best foot forward -- and WIFWA is here to tell the world that you're good enough. Don't waste this opportunity!


"Blurred Lines?" "Rainbow parties?" "Hannah Montana" twerking?

Dear God in heaven. I must be getting really old.


Syria? The news is entirely about Syria? All the talking heads are obsessing about whether or not it would be wise to strike Syria? We must bomb Syria because Syria is bombing Syria??

Yo, assholes. Allow me to clue all of you in: It wouldn't be wise. It would be moronic. It would be counterproductive to the interests of the United States of America.

That doesn't mean Barack Obama will restrain himself, of course.

Some commentators have advanced the thesis that our Maximum Leader is "unserious," and have offered Obama's vacillations over the Syrian civil war as evidence to that effect. I must disagree, at least in part. Obama is perfectly serious -- about Obama. He's sensed that his waffling on this subject has made plain his lack of leadership qualities, most important among them the resolve to follow through on a commitment. The chiefs of state who've declined to help him are snickering at him in private, and he knows it. If there's anything that stirs him to fury, it's being mocked -- or, as his Chicago homies would put it, "dissed."

Granted, most of us wouldn't launch the B-52s over such a slight. But most of us aren't figments of the imagination of a political machine, raised to the heights of power with no preparation in serious statecraft. Most of us aren't painfully aware of our complete personal hollowness and acutely sensitive to any infringement upon our unearned self-esteem. Most of us, in other words, aren't Barack Hussein Obama.


In connection with the above, there's a lot of talk about whether Obama can strike Syria -- i.e., take the United States to war -- exclusively on his own authority.

No, he can't. The Constitution does not give the president the power to take the country to war. As Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, the president can deploy them to defend the United States or its extraterritorial possessions against ongoing or imminent attack -- and that's all. For a hostile act against a nation which has neither struck nor threatened the U.S., he requires Congressional authorization. This is in the Constitution by implication, and made explicit by the War Powers Resolution of 1973.

Two wars -- Korea and Vietnam -- made plain the importance of that constraint. Harry S. Truman took the U.S. to war on the Korean peninsula without Congressional authorization. Lyndon B. Johnson deceived Congress into allowing him to escalate America's participation in the Vietnam War, on the strength of the fraudulently obtained Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. America continues to suffer the consequences of those actions to this day.

Yes, the Constitution's reservation of the warmaking power to Congress has been violated several times. Yes, some of the presidents who've done so are well liked by the historians and generally approved by the American people. The consequences of such a violation of the Supreme Law of the Land don't care about anyone's opinion:

    “Why are you so...fixated on the Constitution, Mr. Sumner? Isn’t it a little bit naive to think a document two centuries old contains all the answers to the problems of a complex modern society?”
    “Have you read it, Miss Weatherly?” Sumner’s voice remained mild.
    “Not lately, no.”
    “Then you might have forgotten that it’s the supreme law of the land. All other law and all government action must conform to it. If it needs to be revised or expanded, it contains provisions for that.”
    “A lot of people would say,” Weatherly cooed, “that we’ve done that, only informally.”     Sumner pursed his lips and glanced down at his shoes. For a moment, Weatherly thought she might finally have scored against his infuriating self-assurance.
    “Miss Weatherly,” he said with a note of regret, “I’m a lawyer. I was raised by a lawyer. He taught me to think of the law as our most precious possession. One of the questions he repeatedly insisted that I ponder was ‘What is the law?’ Not ‘What would I like the law to be,’ but ‘What is it really, and how do I know that’s what it is?’
    “My profession, sadly, has made a practice of twisting the law to its own ends. There aren’t many lawyers left who really care what the law is, as long as they can get the results they want, when they want them. So they play the angles, and collaborate with judges who think they’re black-robed gods, and generally do whatever they can get away with to get what they want, without a moment’s regard for what it does to the knowability of the law.
    “I care. I want to know what the law is, what it permits, requires, and forbids. I want my clients to know. And the only way to reach that result is to insist that the words of the law have exact meanings, not arbitrary, impermanent interpretations that can be changed by some supercilious cretin who thinks he can prescribe and proscribe for the rest of us.
    “The Constitution is the supreme law, the foundation for all other law. If it doesn’t mean exactly what its text says—the public meanings of the words as ordinary people understand them—then no one can possibly know what it means. But if no one can know what the Constitution means, then no one can know whether any other law conforms to it. At that point, all that matters is the will of whoever’s in power. And that’s an exact definition of tyranny."

[From Shadow Of A Sword]

Either that matters to you or it doesn't. If the latter, move very slowly around me and keep your hands where I can see them.


But soft! What real crisis through yonder window peeks?

Hilarity ensued Monday after @Andria_XX complained that social-media criticism of Miley Cyrus included “bodyshaming/slutshaming” and “heteropatriarchal crap.” Readers will recall that Andria has an “Honors BA in Social Justice and Peace Studies” and is pursuing a Master’s degree in Gender Studies. So . . . how’s that going?

For the answer, read Tweet #1 and Tweet #2.

As we Certified Galactic Intellects have been known to say, ignorance can be cured, but stupid is forever -- and no creature that fits into any recognized taxonomic category is as deeply or as irretrievably stupid as a female American "peace studies / social justice" major in her twenties. Still, perhaps all is not lost for this poor soul. There's probably a federal program to provide minders for such persons, lest they foul up traffic by standing naked in the middle of Grand Concourse to protest the insidious wiles of the Evil Dead White European Male Capitalist Heteronormative Patriarchy and get hit by a bus. Also, I understand the "sex worker" industry is still hiring, but perhaps Our Heroine should hold that possibility in reserve.


I'm afraid that will be all for today, Gentle Reader. This fine Saturday has presented me with an agenda that would make a lifelong teetotaler take up blackout drinking. But do please enjoy your Labor Day weekend. Word on the street is that it's about to be bumped off the calendar by an Islamic holiday. And with that, it's off to the toolshed.