I must be getting old. At least, I can’t imagine any other reason why it takes less with each passing day to light my boilers, spin my turbines, and send my pile critical. It can’t be the W-plus bosons; I swept for them yesterday.
No, I think it must be my decreasing patience with persons obsessed with sex.
Obsessions come in many varieties. A sexual obsession need not be about “not getting any.” This morning it’s a critic’s displeasure about fictional characters who are getting some. (With one another, of course.) It’s not the first time. But it’s got me wondering why such persons dare to read fiction in the speculative genres.
I need more coffee if I’m to do this properly. Back in a minute.
Regard, if you please, the panoply of Mankind across the millennia. Consider how widely our customs, especially our customs about mating and procreation, have varied. Consider in particular that many societies, including Jewish and Christian ones, have varied from what Jews and Christians of today mostly view as proper sexual conduct.
Let me be maximally explicit about this. There have been Jewish and Christian societies that sanctified plural marriage. There have been Jewish and Christian societies that accepted sex between the entirely unmarried as no more than a peccadillo, provided that if any offspring were to result, the couple would then marry. There have even been Christian societies (I don’t know of any Jewish ones) that, while they regarded homosexuality as deeply unfortunate and life-limiting, did not execrate it as a terrible sin.
And that’s just Terrestrial Judeo-Christian societies. They haven’t all embraced Saint Paul’s dictum that the only licit sex is between spouses in a monogamous heterosexual marriage.
But I intend to speak here of fiction and fictional settings. Fictional societies will have fictional norms and customs. A fictional Christian society cut off from its Terrestrial forebears, such as the one I depicted on Hope, is unlikely to share those forebears’ norms and customs in every detail. And needless to say, a fictional non-Christian society will have its own unique norms and customs, which will be influenced by whatever degree of religiosity applies to it.
Yet persons unhappy about Louis and Christine’s passion, or about Althea, Martin, and Claire’s triad-marriage, continue to berate me, as if such a thing must never, ever be countenanced even in a far-future speculation. What sort of fiction do they read with total approbation? Do the characters in it ever stray from their prejudices? Do they ever use contraception? Do they ever just let their hair down and fuck?
It seems unlikely.
Allow me to provide two sidelights of significance. Just now I’m reading Tears of Paradox, a dystopian novel by Daniella Bova. The novel’s two Marquee Characters are afflicted by sexual tension they don’t even begin to resolve until they’ve married. Why? Because they’re Catholic: one much more serious about it than the other, at least through the first quarter of the book. That’s the premise. They behave in accordance with it, as is entirely consistent and proper for persons of those convictions.
I have no problem with that. Why should I? Miss Bova has created characters with particular convictions. Each one’s behavior accords with the degree of allegiance he feels toward his faith and its teachings. That’s her prerogative as the story’s creator. I would no more dream of criticizing her for it than I would dream of demanding a slice of the Moon.
Another series I’ve recently enjoyed – and very much, at that – is E. William Brown’s “Daniel Black” fantasy series, which I mentioned illustratively here. The sexual mores depicted in that series are far distant from what contemporary Jews or Christians (if at all doctrinally observant) would countenance. So what? It’s fantasy fiction about a world in which the Norse and Greek Pantheons are fighting a war of extermination against one another. How reasonable would it be to demand that Puritan sexual mores apply there?
It would appear that for some readers, sex is an untouchable. A story that fails to accord with their prejudices in all details is simply unacceptable. I can’t imagine what they would read for pleasure...if pleasure of any sort is something their convictions would allow them.
I could go on about this for pages. It’s part and parcel of one of my greatest disagreements with Christian doctrine. But this isn’t the proper time or place for that particular tirade.
Sexual pleasure and sexual acceptance are among the great motivators of human existence. The great motivators are the things that provide events of substance to fiction. To exclude them reduces the writer’s toolset for drawing his characters into situations worth writing about.
There was once a time when books would be banned from publication, here and elsewhere, for daring to include sex scenes. The most famous and important case of that sort was U.S. v Ulysses. There haven’t been many cases since then of comparable stature.
Times have changed. Among other things, we’ve become somewhat more relaxed – dare I say, more realistic? – about sex, at least sex in fiction. At least, some of us have. However, readers who can’t bear to see their prejudices set aside for the sake of an involved story founded on unique premises still exist.
I pity them.
(Cross-posted at my fiction-promotion site.)
4 comments:
These days, attacks of this sort are much more likely to come from the SJW RadFem Left than the Christian Right. Christians have more or less made peace with sex in fiction, the occasional neo-Puritan notwithstanding. Even the most evangelical sorts appear to avoid reading things that displease them, rather than demanding they never be published in the first place.
SJWs are the ones who spew such nonsense as "all sex is rape" and demand that men never be attracted to beautiful women, under any circumstances.
Nonetheless, regardless of the side... people who think this way are foreign to me. I cannot fathom how the manage to go about life without self-destructing from internal contradiction.
Fran, I want to thank you for turning me on to the "Daniel Black" series. I just finished the first book and the emotion it elicited in me was. . . envy.
Um.. isn't a major point of reading fiction to step into a different reality? If one is going to read every story with their prejudices intact kinda ruins the experience. If non traditional sex/relationships are a problem you'd best avoid a lot of Heinlein.
Initially, the sex in your books was a little jarring - it upended my thinking about who, and what, Louis was.
I do have to disagree with you about extraterrestrial communities. Oh, sure, the first colonies, primarily scientists and explorers, may very well experiment with different mores. However, it's my belief that most of the communities will be more conservative culturally. The extreme need to make changes in so much of their life will rather naturally lead them to seek sameness, or continuity, in their observance of norms. For example, they will be fervent participants in traditional holiday celebrations, as far as possible. They will "bring order to the New West" by imposing cultural structures imported from Earth, and not deviating from them.
Whatever cultural norms were when they left, the new settlers will try to keep as much of them intact as they can. This will lead to a more conservative society than on Earth.
It's just based on my experiences with frequent moves in the early part of my life. The sameness brought security.
Post a Comment