I simply don’t believe in the doctrine of global warming.I am not a climatologist but I am an economist who worked as a statistician and econometrician for 15 years. I know something about the computer models used by the climatologists because they are structurally very similar to the econometric models. I know how easy it is to play with the parameters and how easy it is to get the results you want to get. This doctrine is basically not a doctrine from natural sciences about climate, but rather a doctrine about man and society. The greens and environmentalists are introducing the old collectivist ideas to “control and regulate” and un-free society under new banners.
Actual satellite temperature measures compared to the “predictions” of IPCC sanctioned climate models. The gap is widening ever more. There has been zero global warming in the last 18 years and two months.[1]
Notes
[1] "Our Freedom Is Endangered." By Claudio Grass, Acting Man, 2/24/15. H/t: Stockman's Corner.
3 comments:
Actual satellite temperature measures compared to the “predictions” of IPCC sanctioned climate models. The gap is widening ever more. There has been zero global warming in the last 18 years and two months.[1]
That's funny because when you look at actual satellite measurements for the years between 1860 and 1996 you find massive anthropogenic global warming.
Oh wait, there were no satellite measures prior to 1996 (none comparable to those we get today, anyway). So, on what basis are we assuming that there WAS global warming up until 18 years ago ... when the PRESUMPTIVELY accurate global warming suddenly stopped (or "paused")?
Is there any reason not to use the satellite data to "back-cast" the global temperature? That is, after all, what Phil Jones at CRU did to come up with the alleged "Global Average Temperature".
Actually, he had claimed to "fill in the blanks" in the raw data in this way .... until he was forced to admit that he didn't have any raw data ... he "misplaced" it. (Oh, that darned raw data upon which ALL claims of Global Warming are based, where has it gone to now? I know I left it lying around here someplace.)
"This doctrine is basically not a doctrine from natural sciences about climate, but rather a doctrine about man and society. The greens and environmentalists are introducing the old collectivist ideas to “control and regulate” and un-free society under new banners."
They even admit they need to change the way we all eat,where we all live,what cars we can and an not drive, where we can and can not go,and what we an and can not do on our own properties.
It's a cult,it's earth worship disguised as environmentalism-can't raise animals to eat because it harms Gaia-(the planet)-,can't drive cars powered by gasoline because it harms Gaia,can't heat our homes with oil or natural gas-because it harms Gaia,can't use wood for heat-because it harms Gaia-unless you buy an EPA approved woodstove.
And we must all become vegan,because only by everyone adhering to a strict vegan diet, can "we" save Gaia from the evil human race.
These people are certifiably insane-and our public schools are turning out fresh copies of Gaia worshipers every year...we're screwed.
And please remember, 5.56 XM855 is not vegan, and hurts Gaia, too. I need an airsickness bag...
"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. "
Post a Comment