Sunday, July 2, 2017

Dan Stewart on the implausibility of a Syrian chemical attack.

Dan Stewart's 6/29/17 comment on an American Conservative article by Scott Ritter[1] is very good on why Pres. Assad of Syria would not have ordered a chemical attack on the Syrian population. All around common sense.

See comment here. Cliff Notes version: Assad had nothing to gain and everything to lose by using chemical weapons.

Notes
[1] "Ex-Weapons Inspector: Trump’s Sarin Claims Built on ‘Lie’." By Scott Ritter, The American Conservative, 6/29/17.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated. I am entirely arbitrary about what I allow to appear here. Toss me a bomb and I might just toss it back with interest. You have been warned.