"This is a very complicated issue, not because of ISIS, because ISIS is an organization. There’s something more dangerous to be dealt with, which is the reasons. First of all, the ideology, something that’s been instilled in the minds of the people or the society in the Muslim world for decades now, because of the Wahabi institutions, because of the Saudi money that’s been paid to support this kind of dark and resentful ideology. Without dealing with this ideology, it’s just a waste of time to say we are going to deal with Daesh or al-Nusra or any other organization that belongs to Al Qaeda."~ Bashar al-Assad, President of Syria."So, this is something that should be dealt with on the long term; how to prevent those Wahabi institutions and Saudi money from reaching the Muslim institutions around the world in order to have more extremism and terrorism spreading around the world. This is first."
Diana West has her usually cogent view on what is insane about U.S. policy. This another instance of this insanity. Assad is exactly the kind of Muslim we need to be working with. It's abundantly clear that he wants a secular state and isn't dead set on killing or ejecting Christians, Kurds, Druze, or Sunnis. Clearly he has popular support. Clearly the "civil war" is being carried on by foreign jihadis with foreign money. And with support from our NATO "ally" Turkey, especially in the area of facilitating the lucrative oil trade for ISIS.
Obama would rather give up his next ten vacations to Hawaii than even utter the word "Wahhabi." He lives to carry out the wishes of the Saudi Wahhabis and the Muslim Brotherhood swine who now operate inside our own government thanks to him. But Assad lays it right out there. The names and addresses of the enemies of civilization.
This is what is known as mental clarity.
"Agencia EFE interviews President Bashar al-Assad. 'This dark and resentful ideology.'" By Pundita, 12/11/15.
4 comments:
What do you say we trade Obama + Jarrett + Kerry + Mcconnell + Reid + Pelosi + Ryan and 100 billion dollars as a deal sweetener for President Assad?
Plus Megyn Kelly and the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal.
The perfect solution.
All Muslims - be they Sunni, Shiite, secular, socialist, nationalist, etc. - are the enemies of our formerly Great Republic.
However, a policy of "divide and conquer" would work well.
Thus when the Saudi backed Sunnis are on a roll, we back the Shiites - and vice versa until they become top dog and we revert back to alliance with the Sunnis.
Ronald, I quite like to point out when I can that any Muslim who takes the oath at a naturalization ceremony or who takes a government job swears a false oath. You can't believe in the supremacy of the Koran and shariah and the Constitution at the same time. They didn't abjure Islam at the time of the oath therefore they took the oath in that immortal formulation WITH mental reservation and a purpose of evasion.
D&C works fine though I like the other general meaning of that abbreviation. Given the diseased, intractable nature of Muslim belief, there is simply no dealing with it on any rational or decent basis. They will always be a carbuncle in any non-Muslim country unfortunate to be graced by their presence. We can pussyfoot around with our precious "equality" and "freedom of conscience" sophistry all we want but if WHAT WE DO does not result in the removal of any who wish to remain Muslims then we are committing suicide. Why is EXPULSION just beyond the pale but IMPORTATION is just peachy? It's not as though the latter is without problems for the host countries but the fools and ultra leftist will oppose to the death expulsion or the idea of a problematic presence. Everyone's a precious snowflake.
Post a Comment