Saturday, November 23, 2013

The "Knockout Game"

If you haven't yet learned about this...fad in race relations, congratulations on a nice long nap.

Deb Heine has a particularly poignant plaint about it this morning:

Why doesn’t our first black president step up and say something to stem the tide of this violence? For a guy whose approval numbers are sinking at a perilous rate – a guy who most Americans no longer trust – it would be a smart move – not to mention the right thing to do.

Sorry, Deb, my secret love. Neither Barack Hussein "If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon" Obama nor Attorney-General Eric "A Nation Of Cowards" Holder, both thoroughgoing black racists, will ever say a peep about these long as the victims aren't black.

I wrote some time ago:

Don't kid yourselves. Were American whites ever to conclude that inter-racial peace is impossible, within two years there wouldn't be a black man left alive and free anywhere in this country. We're a numerical majority. We control the preponderance of the land, the wealth, and most important, the weapons. Our targets would wear their affiliation in their flesh. It hasn't happened -- and please God, may it never happen -- because we still believe, despite many disappointments, that inter-racial amity is achievable. Preserving that conviction is the one and only hope American blacks have for their futures, and for those of their children.

What would undermine that conviction?

  1. Clear and convincing evidence that American blacks are irremediably violently hostile toward whites, or:
  2. A groundswell of conviction that such evidence exists, but that our news organs have conspired to deny it to us.

The first condition has not been met. The second condition is being advanced by the Old Media themselves....

When a society makes special provisions for a particular class of persons, such that those persons have a good expectation of not suffering for illegal or antisocial behavior, it has committed the worst imaginable injustice against the persons in that class who honor their society's laws and norms: it has equalized the legal, social, and moral positions of good citizens and thugs. Thus, if ninety percent of such a class is law-abiding and decorous while ten percent is violent, dishonest, or disruptive, the latter category will come to overshadow the former in the perceptions of persons outside the class -- not because ten percent is a majority, but because that anti-social subgroup is identified with the class's special set of privileges....

Success breeds emulation. If there are advantages to be had from the ruthless exploitation of a class privilege, over time more and more members of the class will be drawn into doing so. Thus, the coloration given to the class by its privileges will become stronger and more inclusive over time.

This is not an unbounded progression; as in all other things, a tendency toward equilibrium will ultimately assert itself. However, the mechanisms by which equilibrium is restored are always unpleasant. The deterrents that curb full exploitation of a class privilege, if any exist at all, will be applied by other classes, whether through the law, other social institutions, or "informally." "Informally" usually means lynching: the application of extra-judicial, often unmerited punishment to members of one class by members of another. In the usual case, the lynchers come from a more numerous class than the lynchees, though there are occasional exceptions.

Lynching, if it goes unpunished, is itself a class privilege. There are satisfactions in it that are incomprehensible to moral men who live in ordinary times. As with other activities with innate satisfactions, the popularity of the practice will grow over time. A mob that's tasted the blood of one aristocrat is seldom satisfied with just that one sip.

Lynching writ large is genocide.

The Main Stream Media have only just made mention of the "knockout game" not afflicting American cities. They've been prodded into it by hated rival Fox News, and by the first signs that white America has had enough and is about to retaliate:

On February 26th a man waiting for his six-year-old daughter to be dropped off from school, had no idea he would be the city's first reported victim.

"I saw the van circle twice, and the second time three kids came out. I didn't suspect anything. I hadn't any enemies, or any reason to believe they would be looking to do anything to me."

We are not revealing the victim's identity for his protection.

The victim was attacked by 17-year-old Marvell Weaver. But Weaver did more than try to knock his victim out, he tried to do it with a taser. Luckily for the victim, the taser didn't work and he was able to protect himself with his concealed-carry .40 caliber pistol.

"He shoved something into my side. I wasn't sure what it was. It had some force to it. I wasn't sure if it was a knife or a gun," said the victim.

Weaver was shot twice, in the leg and an inch away from his spine. He's been sentenced to a year in jail for the attack, but he admits he's getting off easy.

"It was just a lesson learned. I wish I hadn't played the game at all," said Weaver.

But Weaver say's this wasn't the first time he'd played it. Before he was caught, he and his friends had attacked random people on several occasions.

"Not many, six or seven. It wouldn't be an every day game, just a certain game to be played on certain days. You don't even try to rob them or anything. That's the game," said Weaver.

And Marvell Weaver? What of him?

You're looking at the first casualty of a flying-lead race war...and the "flying lead" part is no longer a metaphor.

It's been a while since I could look forward with optimism. Developments have made that impossible. There's already been bloodshed. There's going to be more. Black "leaders" have disdained to address any of the trends pointing in that direction; they're too busy shouting about "white racism."

Would you like to see the faces of the persons most responsible for whatever amount of "white racism" there is? The folks who've undone all the progress America made on race relations from 1865 to 1964? The folks who regard interracial tensions as the nourishment for their bank accounts?

Have a sample on me:

And let's not forget these two:

Have a nice day.


Anonymous said...

You have certainly seen the comment: that radical muslims want to kill non-muslims and the moderate muslims want radical muslims to kill non-muslims.

It is a fact which almost everyone will deny (that's a dead giveaway that it's true) that moderate blacks and all blacks secretly deep in their hearts take joy and satisfaction when one of these 18 year old black men ambush some middle aged or old or female white person and clubs them to the ground in one sneaky blow. They may say something publicly that sounds somewhat like disapproval but inside they are happy with it in fact look for the next one to internally cheer for another bow against whites. Obama could come out and say something and he may still do that. But everyone needs to understand that Obama's black supporters don't want him to ever say blacks are the problem. So if it happens the speech will be centered around how the white establishment failed these poor youths and that it will take more money and more "free stuff" to fix this problem. There is no end to the "free stuff" buffet. Our first affirmative action president will demand more affirmative action as a solution. When we we wake up?

Think about this. Trayvon Martin was a young wantabe thug in training. He was destined by his race and his training by the black leaders to someday rape or murder whites and probably blacks too if he chose to. Whatever you want to say abut Zimmerman and his actions that day one thing is sure, Zimmerman probably saved his own life but also probably saved some other person(s) from Trayvon's future actions.

WomanHonorThyself said...

incredible piece and refreshingingly honest about such a taboo subject!
of course its always 'whiteys' fault and what a bonus..they are targeting Jews whom no one will defend...God bless u and keep up the fight!!!!

Francis W. Porretto said...

YIH: A sense of threat from "outside" reinforces the tribe-first characteristic of any tribe-like group. The Jews of the world have lived under threat for many centuries. Just now, that threat is greater than it's been since the end of World War II. I cannot fault them for caring first and foremost about Jewish victims, and secondarily about others...though I must admit, it would be nice if they displayed a bit more concern for the rest of us.

Concerning "civil rights," political alignments, and so forth, I too am mystified by the powerful correlation between Jewish identity and left-liberal views, but I will refrain from speculating about its genesis. There are some things people simply won't discuss outside of a circle of intimates -- and what with the extreme levels of acrimony current in the national dialogue, that strikes me as entirely understandable. For my part, whenever politics comes up around me, I immediately put one hand on my wallet and the other over my "family jewels."

Differ said...

CNN are covering knockout....apparently the perps are "teens" and the only victims are Jewish.....
MSM at its finest....

Backwoods Engineer said...

Fran, great post. I've linked and commented over at The Backwoods Engineer: